LGIT Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 220%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 112%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 233%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 117%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics193% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive101% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory20GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 20GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
16 months ago, 15 months ago.
SystemLGIT Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)  (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory17.2 GB free of 20 GB @ 0 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 14 '23 at 19:02
Run Duration109 Seconds
Run User NOR-User
Background CPU4%
Watch Gameplay: 3080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
12th Gen Intel Core i9-12900K
CPU 0, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 0.15 GHz, turbo 0.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
117% Outstanding
Memory 80.8
1-Core 206
2-Core 411
120% 233 Pts
4-Core 815
8-Core 1,472
137% 1,143 Pts
64-Core 1,976
122% 1,976 Pts
Poor: 93%
This bench: 117%
Great: 117%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080-$700
Asus(1043 882E) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 10GB, Driver: 528.24
Performing below potential (73rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
193% Outstanding
Lighting 283
Reflection 245
Parallax 296
231% 275 fps
MRender 311
Gravity 236
Splatting 172
188% 240 fps
Poor: 163%
This bench: 193%
Great: 202%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$76
367GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 454 452 448 391 206 126 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
101% Outstanding
Read 486
Write 457
Mixed 398
SusWrite 346
95% 422 MB/s
4K Read 34
4K Write 67.2
4K Mixed 44.7
144% 48.6 MB/s
DQ Read 364
DQ Write 317
DQ Mixed 336
253% 339 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 101%
Great: 134%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
LGIT 20GB
0, 0 MHz
16384, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
185% Outstanding
MC Read 76.4
MC Write 75.8
MC Mixed 67.7
209% 73.3 GB/s
SC Read 22.3
SC Write 47.2
SC Mixed 32.4
97% 34 GB/s
Latency 79.1
51% 79.1 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009) Builds (Compare 3 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 193%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 205%
UFO

System: LGIT Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Good Total price: $776
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback