LGIT Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 209%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 111%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 221%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 116%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics185% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive95.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory10GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 10GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (26%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLGIT Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)  (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory7.6 GB free of 10 GB @ 0 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 14 '23 at 18:28
Run Duration109 Seconds
Run User NOR-User
Background CPU 26%
Watch Gameplay: 3080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
12th Gen Intel Core i9-12900K
CPU 0, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 0.15 GHz, turbo 0.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
116% Outstanding
Memory 79.9
1-Core 207
2-Core 411
120% 233 Pts
4-Core 812
8-Core 1,473
137% 1,143 Pts
64-Core 1,960
121% 1,960 Pts
Poor: 93%
This bench: 116%
Great: 117%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080-$435
Asus(1043 882E) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 10GB, Driver: 528.24
Performing below potential (35th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
185% Outstanding
Lighting 265
Reflection 241
Parallax 294
216% 267 fps
MRender 308
Gravity 230
Splatting 168
185% 235 fps
Poor: 163%
This bench: 185%
Great: 202%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
367GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 432 349 328 353 166 131 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
95.9% Outstanding
Read 484
Write 466
Mixed 398
SusWrite 293
92% 410 MB/s
4K Read 34
4K Write 65.6
4K Mixed 42.7
141% 47.4 MB/s
DQ Read 348
DQ Write 310
DQ Mixed 308
237% 322 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 95.9%
Great: 134%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
LGIT 1x10GB
1 of 1 slots used
10GB DIMM RAM
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
183% Outstanding
MC Read 75.3
MC Write 74.5
MC Mixed 67.6
207% 72.5 GB/s
SC Read 22.4
SC Write 47.5
SC Mixed 31.8
97% 33.9 GB/s
Latency 80.8
50% 80.8 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009) Builds (Compare 3 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 193%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 205%
UFO

System: LGIT Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 88% - Excellent Total price: $529
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. Additionally, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback