Asus B85M-G

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 54%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 45%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics75% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
15 months ago, 15 months ago.
MotherboardAsus B85M-G  (all builds)
Memory8.4 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180323
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 14 '23 at 16:47
Run Duration149 Seconds
Run User VNM-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 1660-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E3-1275 v3
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
71.6% Very good
Memory 78
1-Core 98.2
2-Core 200
71% 125 Pts
4-Core 352
8-Core 528
55% 440 Pts
64-Core 540
33% 540 Pts
Poor: 68%
This bench: 71.6%
Great: 85%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti-$143
Nvidia(10DE 2182) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 528.49
Performing below potential (45th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
75% Very good
Lighting 95.1
Reflection 94.4
Parallax 83.6
78% 91 fps
MRender 97.6
Gravity 87.8
Splatting 76.2
70% 87.2 fps
Poor: 70%
This bench: 75%
Great: 81%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
VSP 240GB QVE 240GB
11GB free (System drive)
Firmware: T0420A0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 368
Write 281
Mixed 43.7
50% 231 MB/s
4K Read 18.5
4K Write 66.5
4K Mixed 0.4
64% 28.5 MB/s
DQ Read 90.6
DQ Write 300
DQ Mixed 5.8
59% 132 MB/s
Poor: 34% Great: 79%
Xstar 120GB 120GB
19GB free
Firmware: 907XKR
SusWrite @10s intervals: 183 180 183 63 21 21 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
47.5% Average
Read 428
Write 183
Mixed 27.3
SusWrite 108
41% 187 MB/s
4K Read 21
4K Write 27.4
4K Mixed 20
72% 22.8 MB/s
DQ Read 50.1
DQ Write 18.5
DQ Mixed 8
13% 25.5 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 47.5%
Great: 76%
Dahua C800 2.5 inch SATA 256GB SSD
48GB free
Firmware: DHS20183
SusWrite @10s intervals: 404 410 413 414 409 190 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
86.8% Excellent
Read 429
Write 402
Mixed 346
SusWrite 373
87% 388 MB/s
4K Read 25.9
4K Write 67.9
4K Mixed 33.8
118% 42.5 MB/s
DQ Read 117
DQ Write 340
DQ Mixed 199
161% 219 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 86.8%
Great: 101%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown TEAMGROUP-UD3-1600 0423 TEAMGROUP-UD3-1600 12GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
34% Below average
MC Read 11.9
MC Write 11.8
MC Mixed 10.1
32% 11.3 GB/s
SC Read 9.3
SC Write 11.3
SC Mixed 11.1
30% 10.6 GB/s
Latency 84.3
47% 84.3 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 34%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical B85M-G Builds (Compare 5,958 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus B85M-G - $80

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $317
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback