Packard EasyNote TJ75

Performance Results


Gaming 3% Tree trunk	Desktop 36% Jet ski	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 34.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	3.86% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	49.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (35%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

15 months ago, 15 months ago, 15 months ago.

System	Packard EasyNote TJ75 (all builds)
Motherboard	Packard EasyNote TJ75
Memory	3.2 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit renk
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20100504
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Feb 14 '23 at 12:01
Run Duration	134 Seconds
Run User	TUR-User
Background CPU	35%

PC Performing as expected (40^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5 M 460-$130 18,336 User benchmarks, average bench 40% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.55 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	34.4% Below average	Memory 46.3 1-Core 47.7 2-Core 86.6 36% 60.2 Pts	4-Core 130 8-Core 136 18% 133 Pts	64-Core 134 8% 134 Pts
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 34.4% Great: 47%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6500M 12,937 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Acer(1025 033D) 1GB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008 Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	3.86% Terrible	Lighting 4.8 Reflection 5.9 Parallax 4.2 4% 4.97 fps	MRender 5.2 Gravity 3.6 Splatting 4.9 4% 4.57 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 3.86% Great: 4%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WD Blue 250GB-$90 26,761 User benchmarks, average bench 79% 194GB free (System drive) Firmware: X41110WD SusWrite @10s intervals: 167 173 168 193 201 200 MB/s Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	49.8% Average	Read 198 Write 174 Mixed 153 SusWrite 184 40% 177 MB/s	4K Read 20.9 4K Write 40.6 4K Mixed 28 89% 29.8 MB/s	DQ Read 31.3 DQ Write 87.2 DQ Mixed 41.8 37% 53.4 MB/s
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 49.8% Great: 100%
USB 3.0 500GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 156GB free, PID 1068 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 23 22 23 25 25 25 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	13.6% Very poor	Read 56.9 Write 23.9 Mixed 20.8 SusWrite 23.6 37% 31.3 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0.7 28% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 13.6% Great: 221%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown M471B5273BH1-CF8 80AD HMT125S6BFR8C-G7 6GB 24 User benchmarks, average bench 21% 1066, 1066 MHz 4096, 2048 MB Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)	22% Poor	MC Read 7.4 MC Write 6.8 MC Mixed 9.2 22% 7.8 GB/s	SC Read 5.6 SC Write 5.3 SC Mixed 6 16% 5.63 GB/s	Latency 175 23% 175 ns
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 22% Great: 24%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical EasyNote TJ75 Builds (Compare 32 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 39%

Jet ski

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

System: Packard EasyNote TJ75

CPU
Core i3 M 330IntelBench 38%, 14,119 samples	15x
Core i5 M 430IntelBench 39%, 14,318 samples	9x
Core i5 M 460Intel $130Bench 40%, 18,336 samples	3x

GPU
Radeon HD 6500MAMDBench 3%, 12,937 samples	15x
Mobility Radeon HD 5470ATIBench 1%, 14,621 samples	12x
HD Graphics (Arrandale 0.667/0.766 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 99,513 samples	4x

SSD
BX500 240GBCrucial $28Bench 56%, 142,801 samples	4x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	2x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	2x

RAM
16JSF25664HZ-1G1F1 2x2GBUnknownBench 24%, 1,156 samples	5x
EBJ21UE8BDS0-AE-F 2x2GBUnknownBench 23%, 1,093 samples	5x
16JSF25664HZ-1G1F1 80AD HMT325S6CFR8C-H9 4GBUnknownBench 24%, 12 samples	3x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 18% - Very poor

Total price: $28

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i3-12100F $95	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $171	Nvidia RTX 4070 $542	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16