Fujitsu ESPRIMO_D556

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (85th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 15 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics3.43% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemFujitsu ESPRIMO_D556  (all builds)
MotherboardFUJITSU D3430-A1
Memory5.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20170317
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 22 '17 at 06:53
Run Duration311 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing above expectations (85th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium G4400-$45
CPU1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
63.8% Good
Memory 91.3
1-Core 107
2-Core 216
79% 138 Pts
4-Core 213
8-Core 213
28% 213 Pts
64-Core 214
13% 214 Pts
Poor: 23%
This bench: 63.8%
Great: 61%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 510 (Desktop Skylake)
Fijitsu Siemens(1734 121C) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4463
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
3.43% Terrible
Lighting 3.3
Reflection 4.92
Parallax 3.28
3% 3.83 fps
MRender 5.1
Gravity 2.9
Splatting 8.74
5% 5.58 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 3.43%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD WD5000AZLX-07K2T 500GB
426GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
95.8% Outstanding
Read 164
Write 170
Mixed 146
120% 160 MB/s
4K Read 0.57
4K Write 2.04
4K Mixed 0.35
101% 0.99 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 95.8%
Great: 101%
PNY USB 2.0 FD 4GB
2GB free, PID 6545
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
6.77% Terrible
Read 24.9
Write 4.36
Mixed 3.22
10% 10.8 MB/s
4K Read 9.16
4K Write 0.01
4K Mixed 0.01
35% 3.06 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 6.77%
Great: 8%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378A1G43DB0-CPB 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
44.2% Average
MC Read 15
MC Write 15.1
MC Mixed 13.7
42% 14.6 GB/s
SC Read 12.7
SC Write 14.4
SC Mixed 15
40% 14 GB/s
Latency 65.3
61% 65.3 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 44.2%
Great: 43%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ESPRIMO_D556 Builds (Compare 211 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Fujitsu ESPRIMO_D556

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 86% - Excellent Total price: $79
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback