| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
| Graphics | 52.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 80.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen. |
High background CPU (24%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
| Motherboard | Asus H110M-E (all builds) |
| Memory | 5.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 8.1 |
| BIOS Date | 20160202 |
| Uptime | 1.8 Days |
| Run Date | Nov 22 '17 at 06:41 |
| Run Duration | 122 Seconds |
| Run User | AUS-User |
| Background CPU | 24% |
PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
78.4%
Very good
|
75% 129 Pts
|
53% 396 Pts
|
25% 398 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119
CLim: 2012 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 388.31
Performing below potential (62nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
52.3%
Above average
|
50% 63.4 fps
|
56% 68.2 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung 750 EVO 250GB-$130
160GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MAT01B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
|
80.7%
Excellent
|
74% 337 MB/s
|
118% 40 MB/s
|
90% 175 MB/s
|
|
|
83.1%
Excellent
|
101% 135 MB/s
|
74% 0.66 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 2133 C15 2x4GB-$48
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
|
75.1%
Very good
|
77% 27 GB/s
|
60% 20.9 GB/s
|
58% 68.5 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical H110M-E Builds (Compare 285 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus H110M-E
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i3-6100Intel $40Bench 55%, 110,166 samples | 33x |
| Core i5-6400Intel $79Bench 61%, 171,457 samples | 33x |
| Core i7-7700Intel $167Bench 76%, 256,717 samples | 31x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 27x |
| HD 630 (Desktop Kaby Lake)IntelBench 5%, 153,031 samples | 23x |
| GTX 1060-3GBNvidia $119Bench 52%, 627,793 samples | 20x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 113% - Outstanding | Total price: $145 |