Positivo CI581128TBSEFI

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 27%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics27.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive85.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemPositivo CI581128TBSEFI  (all builds)
MotherboardPositivo NB50TH
Memory3 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20190816
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 13 '23 at 22:39
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-9400-$155
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
88.1% Excellent
Memory 88
1-Core 122
2-Core 242
84% 151 Pts
4-Core 481
8-Core 655
72% 568 Pts
64-Core 654
40% 654 Pts
Poor: 78%
This bench: 88.1%
Great: 91%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1050
Clevo(1558 55A1) 3GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 31.0.15.2849
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
27.2% Poor
Lighting 35.1
Reflection 46.5
Parallax 37.2
29% 39.6 fps
MRender 28.2
Gravity 37.8
Splatting 25.2
24% 30.4 fps
Poor: 19%
This bench: 27.2%
Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme CL1-8D128 128GB
36GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CT20903 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 212 200 129 129 105 88 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
85.9% Excellent
Read 1,003
Write 457
Mixed 240
SusWrite 144
101% 461 MB/s
4K Read 19.8
4K Write 61.7
4K Mixed 13.2
80% 31.6 MB/s
DQ Read 295
DQ Write 327
DQ Mixed 227
194% 283 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 85.9%
Great: 135%
Toshiba MQ04ABF100 1TB
650GB free
Firmware: JU000A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 93 101 115 110 112 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
66.4% Good
Read 123
Write 143
Mixed 53.7
SusWrite 107
78% 107 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 4.4
4K Mixed 0.6
206% 2.13 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 66.4%
Great: 79%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CTD 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
41% Average
MC Read 15.9
MC Write 14.1
MC Mixed 11.2
39% 13.7 GB/s
SC Read 9.7
SC Write 13.6
SC Mixed 12.8
34% 12 GB/s
Latency 69.5
58% 69.5 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 41%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical CI581128TBSEFI Builds (Compare 21 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard

System: Positivo CI581128TBSEFI

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 102% - Outstanding Total price: $155
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback