Asus X550WAK

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 17%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 18.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics1.54% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (51%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
15 months ago, 15 months ago.
SystemAsus X550WAK  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X550WAK
Memory4.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140929
Uptime1.2 Days
Run DateFeb 13 '23 at 16:29
Run Duration122 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU 51%

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A4-5100 APU
P0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.55 GHz, turbo 1.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
18.8% Very poor
Memory 24.9
1-Core 23.1
2-Core 46.8
19% 31.6 Pts
4-Core 73.4
8-Core 80.5
10% 76.9 Pts
64-Core 78.3
5% 78.3 Pts
Poor: 18%
This bench: 18.8%
Great: 35%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 8330
Asus(1043 17AD) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 20.10.35.02
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
1.54% Terrible
Lighting 1.6
Reflection 3.3
Parallax 2.3
1% 2.4 fps
MRender 2.3
Gravity 1.6
Splatting 3.1
2% 2.33 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.54%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba MQ01ABF050 500GB-$32
377GB free (System drive)
Firmware: AM0B1J
SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 76 74 89 85 89 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
42.3% Average
Read 65.1
Write 80.7
Mixed 30
SusWrite 82.1
47% 64.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.6
105% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 42.3%
Great: 60%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 16KTF51264HZ-1G6M1 8JTF5126 4HZ-1GD 1 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
12.6% Very poor
MC Read 5.1
MC Write 3.4
MC Mixed 4.6
12% 4.37 GB/s
SC Read 3.5
SC Write 2.9
SC Mixed 4.4
10% 3.6 GB/s
Latency 287
14% 287 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X550WAK Builds (Compare 6 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 21%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: Asus X550WAK

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback