MSI B450 GAMING PLUS (MS-7B86)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 64%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 60%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (19th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 81 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics89% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive91.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (33%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star MS-7B86
MotherboardMSI B450 GAMING PLUS (MS-7B86)  (all builds)
Memory24.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190125
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateFeb 13 '23 at 16:16
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 33%
Watch Gameplay: 2060 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 2600-$145
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.85 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
68.8% Good
Memory 71.8
1-Core 103
2-Core 200
70% 125 Pts
4-Core 354
8-Core 615
59% 484 Pts
64-Core 871
54% 871 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 68.8%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060-$288
CLim: 2205 MHz, MLim: 3950 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 528.24
Performing below potential (43rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
89% Excellent
Lighting 110
Reflection 104
Parallax 109
90% 108 fps
MRender 139
Gravity 98.5
Splatting 90.7
87% 109 fps
Poor: 80%
This bench: 89%
Great: 97%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 EVO M.2 1TB
645GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT22B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 378 389 393 413 416 414 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
91.9% Outstanding
Read 452
Write 411
Mixed 330
SusWrite 401
90% 398 MB/s
4K Read 26.2
4K Write 70.5
4K Mixed 33.9
120% 43.5 MB/s
DQ Read 274
DQ Write 270
DQ Mixed 244
191% 263 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 91.9%
Great: 133%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F4-3200C16-8GVKB F4-3200C16-8GVKB F4-3200C16-8GVGB F4-3200C16-8GVGB 32GB
1866, 1866, 1866, 1866 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
65% Good
MC Read 24.5
MC Write 22.5
MC Mixed 22.2
66% 23.1 GB/s
SC Read 19.9
SC Write 23.2
SC Mixed 19.6
60% 20.9 GB/s
Latency 97.4
41% 97.4 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 65%
Great: 185%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical B450 GAMING PLUS (MS-7B86) Builds (Compare 2,987 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 70%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 64%
Destroyer

Motherboard: MSI B450 GAMING PLUS (MS-7B86) - $83

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 77% - Very good Total price: $640
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback