Acer Nitro AN515-42

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics8.88% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive56.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemAcer Nitro AN515-42  (all builds)
MotherboardRR Freed_RRS
Memory10 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200618
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateFeb 13 '23 at 15:15
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU 14%

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 2500U
FP5, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
57.3% Above average
Memory 65.5
1-Core 93.4
2-Core 169
62% 109 Pts
4-Core 266
8-Core 436
43% 351 Pts
64-Core 437
27% 437 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 57.3%
Great: 62%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega 8 (Ryzen iGPU)
Acer(1025 125C) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 22.20.27.07
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
8.88% Terrible
Lighting 10.9
Reflection 27.5
Parallax 15.4
9% 17.9 fps
MRender 10.6
Gravity 12.3
Splatting 9.9
9% 10.9 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 8.88%
Great: 11%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HFS128G39TND-N210A 128GB
31GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 30001P10
SusWrite @10s intervals: 128 133 125 114 114 116 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
56.2% Above average
Read 377
Write 132
Mixed 153
SusWrite 122
43% 196 MB/s
4K Read 24.7
4K Write 51.5
4K Mixed 18.1
88% 31.4 MB/s
DQ Read 207
DQ Write 134
DQ Mixed 108
97% 150 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 56.2%
Great: 70%
Toshiba MQ04ABF100 1TB
468GB free
Firmware: JU001J
SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 84 85 84 84 85 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
58.4% Above average
Read 116
Write 136
Mixed 45.9
SusWrite 85.5
70% 96 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 6
4K Mixed 0.5
212% 2.53 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 58.4%
Great: 79%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA81GS6AFR8N-UH CT8G4SFS824A.M8FE 16GB
2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (23rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
73.8% Very good
MC Read 27.8
MC Write 27.6
MC Mixed 25.1
77% 26.8 GB/s
SC Read 18.9
SC Write 27.7
SC Mixed 20.7
64% 22.4 GB/s
Latency 113
36% 113 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 73.8%
Great: 84%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Nitro AN515-42 Builds (Compare 866 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Nitro AN515-42

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback