Gigabyte GA-B250M-D2V-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 30%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics46.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive37.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemGigabyte B250M-D2V
MotherboardGigabyte GA-B250M-D2V-CF  (all builds)
Memory4.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170706
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateFeb 13 '23 at 14:26
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7500-$88
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
70.8% Very good
Memory 82.7
1-Core 109
2-Core 214
76% 135 Pts
4-Core 337
8-Core 362
46% 350 Pts
64-Core 363
22% 363 Pts
Poor: 45%
This bench: 70.8%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 570-$130
CLim: 1280 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 22.11.2
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
46.7% Average
Lighting 58.6
Reflection 59.6
Parallax 79.6
48% 65.9 fps
MRender 59.5
Gravity 66.1
Splatting 42.5
45% 56 fps
Poor: 37%
This bench: 46.7%
Great: 49%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSD 120GB 120GB
26GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R0831B0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 363 37 48 30 30 24 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
37.7% Below average
Read 491
Write 372
Mixed 23.7
SusWrite 88.7
54% 244 MB/s
4K Read 21.2
4K Write 13.6
4K Mixed 1
41% 11.9 MB/s
DQ Read 64.1
DQ Write 15.5
DQ Mixed 1
11% 26.9 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 37.7%
Great: 81%
WD RE4 500GB (2010)-$30
101GB free
Firmware: 01.01S05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 111 111 100 87 86 105 MB/s
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
55.4% Above average
Read 92.6
Write 86.1
Mixed 80.5
SusWrite 100
66% 89.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.8
163% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 55.4%
Great: 76%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT4G4DFS8213.C8FBD2 859B CT4G4DFS8213.M8FB 8GB
2133, 2133 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
69% Good
MC Read 24.5
MC Write 27.8
MC Mixed 21.2
70% 24.5 GB/s
SC Read 15.3
SC Write 26.3
SC Mixed 20.1
59% 20.6 GB/s
Latency 75.7
53% 75.7 ns
Poor: 45%
This bench: 69%
Great: 71%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-B250M-D2V-CF Builds (Compare 1,133 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-B250M-D2V-CF - $70

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 89% - Excellent Total price: $227
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback