Gigabyte GA-H310M D3H

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing CPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Graphics5.2% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive38.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (85%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
15 months ago, 15 months ago.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-H310M D3H  (all builds)
Memory1.2 GB free of 4 GB @ 2.4 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20200707
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 13 '23 at 08:41
Run Duration121 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU 85%

 PC Performing below expectations (25th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-8100-$110
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
1-Core 98.8
2-Core 200
68% 150 Pts
4-Core 208
8-Core 370
35% 289 Pts
64-Core 376
23% 376 Pts
Poor: 53% Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630 (Desktop Coffee Lake i3)
Gigabyte(1458 D000) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.100.9894
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
5.2% Terrible
Lighting 5.8
Reflection 3.9
Parallax 6.6
5% 5.43 fps
MRender 5.5
Gravity 5.9
Splatting 9.9
6% 7.1 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.2%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SA400M8240G 240GB
198GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFK62B3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 234 142 157 142 140 140 MB/s
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
38.6% Below average
Read 202
Write 212
Mixed 190
SusWrite 159
43% 191 MB/s
4K Read 11.6
4K Write 20.1
4K Mixed 8.8
40% 13.5 MB/s
DQ Read 188
DQ Write 218
DQ Mixed 151
128% 186 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 38.6%
Great: 91%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown R744G2400U1S 1x4GB
1 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
17.8% Very poor
MC Read 6.9
MC Write 8.1
MC Mixed 5.8
20% 6.93 GB/s
SC Read 2
SC Write 5.9
SC Mixed 2.8
10% 3.57 GB/s
Latency 558
7% 558 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 17.8%
Great: 47%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-H310M D3H Builds (Compare 73 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 32%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H310M D3H

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 118% - Outstanding Total price: $144
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback