User System

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 81%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 124%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics124% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHUANANZHI
MotherboardHUANANZHI X99-F8D PLUS
Memory121.6 GB free of 128 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220713
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 12 '23 at 19:47
Run Duration305 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2697 v3
SOCKET 0, 2 CPU, 28 cores, 56 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
60.3% Good
Memory 56.1
1-Core 97.3
2-Core 186
62% 113 Pts
4-Core 345
8-Core 672
60% 509 Pts
64-Core 3,167
196% 3,167 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 60.3%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485
MSI(1462 3609) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1936 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 528.49
Performing below potential (55th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
124% Outstanding
Lighting 168
Reflection 188
Parallax 175
137% 177 fps
MRender 134
Gravity 178
Splatting 123
117% 145 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 124%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adaptec Array 1.5TB
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: V1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 457 424 430 429 379 400 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 67% Great: 71%
Adaptec Array 4TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: V1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 890 901 914 917 915 914 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Timetec MS05 256GB
219GB free
Firmware: U1013A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 383 389 381 388 386 387 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
77.3% Very good
Read 455
Write 400
Mixed 399
SusWrite 385
92% 410 MB/s
4K Read 23.9
4K Write 52.8
4K Mixed 17
86% 31.2 MB/s
DQ Read 149
DQ Write 308
DQ Mixed 35.3
82% 164 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 77.3%
Great: 91%
Kingston SNVS250G 250GB
465GB free
Firmware: S8H40103
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1772 1770 1755 1767 1768 1765 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
250% Outstanding
Read 2,203
Write 1,854
Mixed 1,220
SusWrite 1,766
395% 1,761 MB/s
4K Read 33.3
4K Write 67.1
4K Mixed 20.1
112% 40.2 MB/s
DQ Read 663
DQ Write 304
DQ Mixed 273
258% 413 MB/s
Poor: 94%
This bench: 250%
Great: 211%
Adaptec Array 8TB
3TB free
Firmware: V1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 196 193 207 187 195 204 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 52% Great: 105%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 9965698-021.A00G 8x16GB
8 of 8 slots used
128GB DIMM DDR4 2933 MHz clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (40th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
116% Outstanding
MC Read 55
MC Write 42
MC Mixed 44.8
135% 47.3 GB/s
SC Read 11.2
SC Write 19.4
SC Mixed 19.4
48% 16.7 GB/s
Latency 140
29% 140 ns
Poor: 115%
This bench: 116%
Great: 118%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback