MSI MPG X570 GAMING PRO CARBON WIFI (MS-7B93)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 147%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 152%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics181% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive422% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (24%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
16 months ago, 16 months ago.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7B93
MotherboardMSI MPG X570 GAMING PRO CARBON WIFI (MS-7B93)  (all builds)
Memory20.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220825
Uptime1.7 Days
Run DateFeb 12 '23 at 14:35
Run Duration240 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 24%
Watch Gameplay: 3080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X-$190
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
82.5% Excellent
Memory 68.9
1-Core 142
2-Core 283
87% 165 Pts
4-Core 515
8-Core 923
86% 719 Pts
64-Core 1,399
87% 1,399 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 82.5%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080-$700
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 10GB, Driver: 528.02
Performing below potential (23rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
181% Outstanding
Lighting 259
Reflection 235
Parallax 263
211% 252 fps
MRender 306
Gravity 223
Splatting 163
181% 231 fps
Poor: 163%
This bench: 181%
Great: 202%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SKC3000D2048G 2TB
1TB free (System drive)
Firmware: EIFK31.6
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2987 2644 2225 2372 2675 2934 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
422% Outstanding
Read 2,718
Write 4,068
Mixed 2,982
SusWrite 2,640
703% 3,102 MB/s
4K Read 65.1
4K Write 193
4K Mixed 95.6
323% 118 MB/s
DQ Read 1,326
DQ Write 1,000
DQ Mixed 1,133
855% 1,153 MB/s
Poor: 278%
This bench: 422%
Great: 614%
Seagate ST16000NE000-2RW103 16TB
9TB free
Firmware: EN02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 211 214 217 232 233 227 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 30% Great: 86%
WD Red 8TB (2016)-$201
7TB free
Firmware: 83.H
SusWrite @10s intervals: 150 162 162 153 147 151 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
90.3% Outstanding
Read 161
Write 152
Mixed 71.3
SusWrite 154
98% 135 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 1.2
216% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 90.3%
Great: 97%
WD Black 6TB (2015)-$270
5TB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 217 204 217 210 211 209 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 61% Great: 118%
Seagate ST10000V N0004-1ZD101 10TB
3.5TB free
Firmware: SC61
SusWrite @10s intervals: 226 229 230 229 227 225 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 48% Great: 121%
ORICO H/ W RAID5 24TB
2.5TB free, PID a578
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 148 159 151 158 167 165 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
57.3% Above average
Read 148
Write 138
Mixed 40.7
SusWrite 158
160% 121 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.3
26% 0.43 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 57.3%
Great: 76%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GB-$120
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
65% Good
MC Read 26.2
MC Write 17.8
MC Mixed 26
67% 23.3 GB/s
SC Read 19.1
SC Write 17.2
SC Mixed 24.1
58% 20.1 GB/s
Latency 104
38% 104 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 65%
Great: 114%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MPG X570 GAMING PRO CARBON WIFI (MS-7B93) Builds (Compare 4,572 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 161%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 162%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI MPG X570 GAMING PRO CARBON WIFI (MS-7B93)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 75% - Very good Total price: $989
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback