Huananzhi Default string

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Boot Drive56.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemHuananzhi Default string  (all builds)
MotherboardHUANANZHI X99-TF
Memory27 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.9 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200525
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateFeb 12 '23 at 13:00
Run Duration144 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2666 v3
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
80.3% Excellent
Memory 89
1-Core 98
2-Core 193
74% 127 Pts
4-Core 385
8-Core 756
68% 570 Pts
64-Core 1,265
78% 1,265 Pts
Poor: 66%
This bench: 80.3%
Great: 79%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingdian S280 120GB
47GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 207 54 42 42 50 40 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
56.4% Above average
Read 478
Write 390
Mixed 133
SusWrite 72.4
59% 268 MB/s
4K Read 30.5
4K Write 24.2
4K Mixed 23.4
89% 26 MB/s
DQ Read 157
DQ Write 97.5
DQ Mixed 13.4
41% 89.4 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 56.4%
Great: 109%
Xraydisk 256GB 256GB
26GB free
Firmware: T0214B0L
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,204
Write 1,151
Mixed 844
237% 1,066 MB/s
4K Read 37.7
4K Write 90.7
4K Mixed 22.1
134% 50.2 MB/s
DQ Read 351
DQ Write 529
DQ Mixed 330
281% 403 MB/s
Poor: 35% Great: 156%
Toshiba P300 1TB-$40
172GB free
Firmware: A8J0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 148 150 152 152 154 158 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
86.4% Excellent
Read 149
Write 127
Mixed 19.7
SusWrite 152
81% 112 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.4
89% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 86.4%
Great: 107%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393B1K70DH0-CMA 4x8GB
4 of 16 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 1867 MHz clocked @ 1866 MHz
Performing below potential (78th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
116% Outstanding
MC Read 51.3
MC Write 43.5
MC Mixed 41.9
130% 45.6 GB/s
SC Read 15.5
SC Write 19.2
SC Mixed 20.3
52% 18.3 GB/s
Latency 68.5
58% 68.5 ns
Poor: 49%
This bench: 116%
Great: 125%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Default string Builds (Compare 277 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 27%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

System: Huananzhi Default string

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 118% - Outstanding Total price: $59
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. Additionally, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback