Fujitsu CELSIUS M720 POWER

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics2.97% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
15 months ago, 15 months ago.
SystemFujitsu CELSIUS M720 POWER  (all builds)
MotherboardFUJITSU D3128-A1
Memory28.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130320
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 12 '23 at 09:16
Run Duration141 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing below expectations (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-1620 0-$345
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
70.7% Very good
Memory 83.9
1-Core 96.2
2-Core 193
72% 124 Pts
4-Core 316
8-Core 425
47% 370 Pts
64-Core 453
28% 453 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 70.7%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro 600
Nvidia(10DE 0835) 1GB
CLim: 640 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 377.83
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
2.97% Terrible
Lighting 3.5
Reflection 5.3
Parallax 1.2
3% 3.33 fps
MRender 5.2
Gravity 4
Splatting 3
3% 4.07 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 2.97%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
LSI Logical Volume 16TB
926GB free
Firmware: 3000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 228 232 237 228 237 239 MB/s
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
30.8% Below average
Read 243
Write 222
Mixed 86.1
SusWrite 234
44% 196 MB/s
4K Read 8.6
4K Write 14.1
4K Mixed 1.7
23% 8.13 MB/s
DQ Read 10.8
DQ Write 15.1
DQ Mixed 5.2
6% 10.4 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 30.8%
Great: 52%
WD VelociRaptor 2.5" 500GB-$122
409GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 04.06A00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 147 119 112 116 110 117 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
86.8% Excellent
Read 181
Write 173
Mixed 107
SusWrite 120
107% 145 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 4.9
4K Mixed 1.6
327% 2.63 MB/s
Poor: 66%
This bench: 86.8%
Great: 113%
LSI Logical Volume 299GB
245GB free
Firmware: 3000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 53 54 55 53 55 56 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
64.3% Good
Read 170
Write 53.6
Mixed 76.6
SusWrite 54.4
66% 88.6 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.9
169% 1 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 64.3%
Great: 101%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393B5170EH1- 8x4GB
8 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
83.7% Excellent
MC Read 32.1
MC Write 34.6
MC Mixed 30.5
93% 32.4 GB/s
SC Read 15.9
SC Write 13.7
SC Mixed 12.4
40% 14 GB/s
Latency 73.7
54% 73.7 ns
Poor: 69%
This bench: 83.7%
Great: 102%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical CELSIUS M720 POWER Builds (Compare 34 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 28%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard

System: Fujitsu CELSIUS M720 POWER

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $474
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback