Performance Results


Gaming 65% Destroyer	Desktop 93% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 62% Destroyer


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	67.7% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	193% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	HP ENVY Laptop 15-ep0xxx (all builds)
Motherboard	HP 878E
Memory	20.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit couleurs, 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20220719
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Feb 12 '23 at 05:55
Run Duration	155 Seconds
Run User	FRA-User
Background CPU	12%

PC Performing as expected (57^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i9-10885H 6,135 User benchmarks, average bench 81% U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)	86.6% Excellent	Memory 86.8 1-Core 134 2-Core 263 89% 161 Pts	4-Core 465 8-Core 780 76% 622 Pts	64-Core 1,162 72% 1,162 Pts
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 86.6% Great: 95%

Graphics Cards	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10
Nvidia GeForce RTX 2060 with Max-Q Design 7,329 User benchmarks, average bench 64% HP(103C 878E) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 2750 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 527.56 Performing below potential (74^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	67.7% Good	Lighting 83.4 Reflection 96.2 Parallax 80.2 68% 86.6 fps	MRender 105 Gravity 72.2 Splatting 74.2 67% 83.8 fps
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 67.7% Great: 72%
Intel UHD Graphics 187,969 User benchmarks, average bench 5% HP(103C 878E) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2114 Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	5.79% Terrible	Lighting 6 Reflection 9.4 Parallax 8.1 5% 7.83 fps	MRender 10 Gravity 6.8 Splatting 10.4 8% 9.07 fps
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 5.79% Great: 6%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLB2T0HMLB-000H1 2TB 289 User benchmarks, average bench 239% 640GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXB71H1Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 1417 1214 1270 1255 1239 1265 MB/s Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	193% Outstanding	Read 1,222 Write 1,915 Mixed 1,139 SusWrite 1,277 314% 1,388 MB/s	4K Read 37.6 4K Write 63.4 4K Mixed 46 150% 49 MB/s	DQ Read 528 DQ Write 349 DQ Mixed 453 334% 444 MB/s
Poor: 140% ↑ This bench: 193% Great: 328%
WDC WD30 EZRX-00D8PB0 3TB 99 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 126GB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 90 89 86 88 90 MB/s Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)	38% Below average	Read 85.6 Write 86.6 Mixed 74.7 SusWrite 88.1 114% 83.8 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.9 102% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 38% Great: 58%
WDC WD30 EZRX-00SPEB0 3TB 42 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 626GB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 87 90 89 86 88 90 MB/s Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	32.8% Below average	Read 85.6 Write 87.7 Mixed 40.9 SusWrite 88.3 101% 75.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 0.3 4K Mixed 0.4 27% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 32.8% Great: 59%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 16ATF2G64HZ-3G2J1 2x16GB 2,294 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 2 of 2 slots used 32GB SODIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 2933 MHz Performing below potential (55^th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	89.7% Excellent	MC Read 33 MC Write 36 MC Mixed 27.3 92% 32.1 GB/s	SC Read 17.7 SC Write 37.8 SC Mixed 27.2 79% 27.6 GB/s	Latency 70.6 57% 70.6 ns
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 89.7% Great: 100%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 12%

Tree trunk

Desktop 75%

Battleship

Workstation 12%

Tree trunk

GPU
UHD GraphicsIntelBench 5%, 187,969 samples	254x
GeForce RTX 2060 with Max-Q DesignNvidiaBench 64%, 7,329 samples	137x
GTX 1660-Ti (Mobile Max-Q)NvidiaBench 57%, 12,899 samples	46x

SSD
KIOXIA 1TBKxg60znv1t02Bench 208%, 4,378 samples	65x
KIOXIA 512GBKxg60znv512gBench 192%, 6,082 samples	40x
PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00-1006 1TBWDCBench 242%, 3,055 samples	34x

RAM
4ATF1G64HZ-3G2E2 2x8GBMicronBench 71%, 19,121 samples	79x
M471A2K43DB1-CWE 2x16GBSamsungBench 91%, 15,521 samples	46x
M471A1K43DB1-CWE 2x8GBSamsungBench 86%, 69,946 samples	44x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16