Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 37% Jet ski	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 37.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	1.51% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	33% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

16 months ago, 16 months ago.

PC Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron 2957U 2,764 User benchmarks, average bench 38% BGA-1168, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.4 GHz, turbo 1.4 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (48^th percentile)	37.9% Below average	Memory 67.4 1-Core 34.9 2-Core 46.8 36% 49.7 Pts	4-Core 52.5 8-Core 52.3 7% 52.4 Pts	64-Core 63.1 4% 63.1 Pts
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 37.9% Great: 46%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (G4 Pentium/Celeron 1.05/1.15 GHz) 43,454 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Asus(1043 8534) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.5171 Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	1.51% Terrible	Lighting 1.6 Reflection 1.6 Parallax 2.7 1% 1.97 fps	MRender 4.1 Gravity 1 Splatting 2.1 2% 2.4 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.51% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung PM810 mSATA 128GB 361 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 81GB free (System drive) Firmware: AXM18D1Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 160 118 164 170 159 191 MB/s Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)	33% Below average	Read 180 Write 184 Mixed 138 SusWrite 160 37% 166 MB/s	4K Read 9.5 4K Write 24 4K Mixed 11.5 42% 15 MB/s	DQ Read 94.4 DQ Write 46.6 DQ Mixed 20.3 28% 53.8 MB/s
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 33% Great: 43%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial CT51264BF160B.C16F 2x4GB 4,853 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 2 of 2 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing as expected (46^th percentile)	30.3% Below average	MC Read 9.5 MC Write 9.5 MC Mixed 12.5 30% 10.5 GB/s	SC Read 7.7 SC Write 6.9 SC Mixed 9.5 23% 8.03 GB/s	Latency 108 37% 108 ns
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 30.3% Great: 57%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 1%

Tree trunk

Desktop 19%

Surfboard

Workstation 1%

Tree trunk

CPU
Celeron 2957UIntelBench 38%, 2,764 samples	5x

GPU
HD Graphics (G4 Pentium/Celeron 1.05/1.15 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 43,454 samples	5x

SSD
PM810 mSATA 128GBSamsungBench 34%, 361 samples	1x
SSDNow mS200 mSATA 120GBKingston $100Bench 67%, 901 samples	1x
C400 RealSSD mSATA 128GBMicron $159Bench 50%, 644 samples	1x

RAM
HMT425S6CFR6A-PB 1x2GBHynixBench 15%, 2,027 samples	1x
9905469-157.A00LF 1x4GBKingstonBench 22%, 198 samples	1x
CT51264BF160B.C16F 2x4GBCrucialBench 38%, 4,853 samples	1x