Asus ROG MAXIMUS X HERO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics39.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive93% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (49%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus ROG MAXIMUS X HERO  (all builds)
Memory16.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20171221
Uptime11 Days
Run DateFeb 11 '23 at 15:35
Run Duration173 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 49%
Watch Gameplay: 480 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8700K-$184
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
80.1% Excellent
Memory 83.7
1-Core 115
2-Core 226
80% 142 Pts
4-Core 412
8-Core 702
68% 557 Pts
64-Core 1,042
64% 1,042 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 80.1%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 480-$75
CLim: 1303 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 22.20.27.07
Performing below potential (20th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
39.7% Below average
Lighting 46.8
Reflection 60
Parallax 66.9
38% 57.9 fps
MRender 63.2
Gravity 52.3
Splatting 44.9
43% 53.5 fps
Poor: 35%
This bench: 39.7%
Great: 53%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
147GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 390 400 413 396 385 414 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
93% Outstanding
Read 409
Write 430
Mixed 362
SusWrite 400
90% 400 MB/s
4K Read 25.1
4K Write 57.7
4K Mixed 36.5
115% 39.8 MB/s
DQ Read 381
DQ Write 341
DQ Mixed 355
268% 359 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 93%
Great: 134%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
79GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 399 412 374 341 322 295 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
91.8% Outstanding
Read 439
Write 447
Mixed 362
SusWrite 357
90% 401 MB/s
4K Read 27.3
4K Write 56.1
4K Mixed 35.5
116% 39.6 MB/s
DQ Read 381
DQ Write 342
DQ Mixed 358
269% 360 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 91.8%
Great: 134%
WD Black 2TB (2013)-$51
719GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 151 149 151 149 149 148 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
82.5% Excellent
Read 138
Write 163
Mixed 82.1
SusWrite 150
98% 133 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 3
4K Mixed 0.9
197% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 82.5%
Great: 112%
WD WD1001FALS-41Y6A1 1TB
648GB free
Firmware: 05.03D06
SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 102 102 103 100 99 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
58.1% Above average
Read 101
Write 94.8
Mixed 78.8
SusWrite 101
69% 94 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.9
174% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 58.1%
Great: 75%
Drobo 5D 17.5TB
9.5TB free, PID 3455
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 157 130 136 131 151 130 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
74.8% Very good
Read 191
Write 220
Mixed 136
SusWrite 139
231% 172 MB/s
4K Read 3.1
4K Write 5.2
4K Mixed 1.1
226% 3.13 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 74.8%
Great: 74%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2400 C16 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
79.4% Very good
MC Read 30
MC Write 31
MC Mixed 25.4
82% 28.8 GB/s
SC Read 16.6
SC Write 28.1
SC Mixed 21.5
63% 22.1 GB/s
Latency 74
54% 74 ns
Poor: 57%
This bench: 79.4%
Great: 98%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ROG MAXIMUS X HERO Builds (Compare 3,677 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 112%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 103%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG MAXIMUS X HERO - $250

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 84% - Excellent Total price: $1,118
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $80Nvidia RTX 4070 $542Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback