Fujitsu LIFEBOOK U757

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics4.39% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive54.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemFujitsu LIFEBOOK U757  (all builds)
MotherboardFUJITSU FJNB2B1
Memory10.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920x1080x4294967296 szín, 1024x768x4294967296 szín
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190516
Uptime19.4 Days
Run DateFeb 11 '23 at 08:22
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6300U
Onboard, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
52.3% Above average
Memory 75.1
1-Core 57
2-Core 104
50% 78.7 Pts
4-Core 171
8-Core 182
23% 177 Pts
64-Core 174
11% 174 Pts
Poor: 16%
This bench: 52.3%
Great: 54%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 520 (Mobile Skylake)
Fujitsu(10CF 1959) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 21.20.16.5174
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
4.39% Terrible
Lighting 4.9
Reflection 3.9
Parallax 4.8
4% 4.53 fps
MRender 6.5
Gravity 4.7
Splatting 7.3
5% 6.17 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.39%
Great: 5%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSD_2.5"_TLC_256GB_InnovationIT 256GB
30GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V0218A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 178 60 76 57 116 75 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
54.4% Above average
Read 416
Write 375
Mixed 353
SusWrite 93.8
69% 309 MB/s
4K Read 21
4K Write 47.3
4K Mixed 17
79% 28.4 MB/s
DQ Read 188
DQ Write 199
DQ Mixed 28.5
67% 138 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 54.4%
Great: 96%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CRC 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
53.7% Above average
MC Read 20
MC Write 20.4
MC Mixed 18.2
56% 19.5 GB/s
SC Read 9.9
SC Write 15.8
SC Mixed 14.7
38% 13.5 GB/s
Latency 90.2
44% 90.2 ns
Poor: 50%
This bench: 53.7%
Great: 78%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical LIFEBOOK U757 Builds (Compare 39 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Fujitsu LIFEBOOK U757

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a large proportion lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales (4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc.). UserBenchmark's data helps consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. In addition, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback