Apple MacBookAir7,2

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 53.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics5.72% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
16 months ago, 16 months ago.
SystemApple MacBookAir7,2  (all builds)
MotherboardApple Mac-937CB26E2E02BB01
Memory3.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220906
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateFeb 10 '23 at 23:46
Run Duration131 Seconds
Run User ECU-User
Background CPU 15%

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-5350U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
53.3% Above average
Memory 74.4
1-Core 76.9
2-Core 137
58% 96.2 Pts
4-Core 189
8-Core 185
25% 187 Pts
64-Core 193
12% 193 Pts
Poor: 36%
This bench: 53.3%
Great: 61%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 6000 (Mobile)
Apple(106B 011B) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4531
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
5.72% Terrible
Lighting 7.3
Reflection 2.8
Parallax 7.7
6% 5.93 fps
MRender 5.8
Gravity 6.5
Splatting 6.8
5% 6.37 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 5.72%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Apple SM0128G PCIe 121GB
31GB free (System drive)
Firmware: BXZ33A0Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 948
Write 579
Mixed 508
150% 678 MB/s
4K Read 25.5
4K Write 56.7
4K Mixed 29.7
107% 37.3 MB/s
DQ Read 415
DQ Write 263
DQ Mixed 286
227% 321 MB/s
Poor: 78% Great: 220%
Sobetter Ext 2TB
362GB free
Firmware: 0204
SusWrite @10s intervals: 118 132 131 132 130 128 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
62.1% Good
Read 88.1
Write 109
Mixed 97.4
SusWrite 128
78% 106 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.7
148% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 62.1%
Great: 74%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 0x4D5435324C3531324D3332443250462D3130 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
44.2% Average
MC Read 14.4
MC Write 17.9
MC Mixed 14
44% 15.4 GB/s
SC Read 11.8
SC Write 13
SC Mixed 13.9
37% 12.9 GB/s
Latency 91.5
44% 91.5 ns
Poor: 41%
This bench: 44.2%
Great: 86%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MacBookAir7,2 Builds (Compare 271 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: Apple MacBookAir7,2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they've no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products, which UserBenchmark reveals.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. The 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data which saves our users millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback