Dell Precision Tower 7910

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 68%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 91%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics97.3% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive102% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
16 months ago, 16 months ago.
SystemDell Precision Tower 7910
MotherboardDell Precision Tower 7910  (all builds)
Memory118.7 GB free of 128 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201019
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateFeb 10 '23 at 22:20
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3
SOCKET 1, 2 CPU, 24 cores, 48 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
63.4% Good
Memory 67
1-Core 66.1
2-Core 174
57% 102 Pts
4-Core 320
8-Core 642
57% 481 Pts
64-Core 2,556
158% 2,556 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 63.4%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195
CLim: 2012 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 516.94
Performing below potential (21st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
97.3% Outstanding
Lighting 119
Reflection 139
Parallax 125
97% 128 fps
MRender 114
Gravity 128
Splatting 118
98% 120 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 97.3%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 870 2TB
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 443 440 429 431 431 430 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
102% Outstanding
Read 429
Write 428
Mixed 410
SusWrite 434
96% 425 MB/s
4K Read 32.5
4K Write 67.3
4K Mixed 45.3
143% 48.4 MB/s
DQ Read 341
DQ Write 254
DQ Mixed 290
219% 295 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 102%
Great: 119%
Hitachi HUS726020AL 2TB
2TB free
Firmware: T7J7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 188 189 193 190 187 191 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
107% Outstanding
Read 184
Write 186
Mixed 88.4
SusWrite 190
118% 162 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 1.1
194% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 107%
Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393A1G43DB0-CPB Micron 9ASF1G72PZ-2G3B1 M393A1G43DB0-CPB Micron 9ASF1G72PZ-2G3B1 M393A1G43DB0-CPB Micron 9ASF1G72PZ-2G3B1 M393A1G43DB0-CPB Micron 9ASF1G72PZ-2G3B1 M393A1G43DB0-CPB Micron 9ASF1G72PZ... 128GB
2133, 2400, 2133, 2400, 2133, 2400, 2133, 2400, 2133, 2400, 2133, 2400, 2133, 2400, 2133, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
116% Outstanding
MC Read 54.7
MC Write 43
MC Mixed 44.6
136% 47.4 GB/s
SC Read 9.7
SC Write 17.5
SC Mixed 16.2
41% 14.5 GB/s
Latency 109
37% 109 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Precision Tower 7910 Builds (Compare 1,182 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 31%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 41%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Dell Precision Tower 7910

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback