PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 46%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average. |
Graphics | 43.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 84.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asus PRIME Z370-P II (all builds) |
Memory | 4.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20180921 |
Uptime | 6.3 Days |
Run Date | Feb 10 '23 at 16:49 |
Run Duration | 213 Seconds |
Run User | GBR-User |
Background CPU | 94% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i5-9600K-$137
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.55 GHz (avg)
|
46%
Average
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1650-$155
Nvidia(10DE 2188) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 528.24
|
43.8%
Average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
71GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 359 321 227 130 121 121 MB/s
|
84.7%
Excellent
|
|||
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$37
1TB free
Firmware: CC25
SusWrite @10s intervals: 192 185 184 193 181 126 MB/s
|
103%
Outstanding
|
|||
WD Green 2TB (2012)-$50
104GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 76 77 76 75 76 MB/s
|
47.1%
Average
|
|||
WD Green 2TB (2012)-$50
987GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 103 105 104 102 103 MB/s
|
60.6%
Good
|
|||
TOSHIBA DT01ACA200 2TB
56GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.7 6.4 4.9 5.5 6.8 6.4 MB/s
|
15%
Very poor
|
|||
SAMSUNG HD204UI 2TB
30GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 35 34 33 36 33 34 MB/s
|
19.3%
Very poor
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Corsair CM4X16GC3000C15K4 1x16GB
1 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2747 MHz
|
33.4%
Below average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i5-9600KIntel $137Bench 93%, 321,194 samples | 554x |
Core i7-8700Intel $186Bench 87%, 349,567 samples | 515x |
Core i7-9700KIntel $264Bench 97%, 550,833 samples | 458x |
GPU | |
---|---|
RTX 2070Nvidia $200Bench 104%, 478,117 samples | 334x |
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 255x |
RTX 2060Nvidia $287Bench 90%, 645,160 samples | 222x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 115% - Outstanding | Total price: $454 |