Asus PRIME Z370-P II

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 46%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics43.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive84.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (94%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
16 months ago, 15 months ago.
MotherboardAsus PRIME Z370-P II  (all builds)
Memory4.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180921
Uptime6.3 Days
Run DateFeb 10 '23 at 16:49
Run Duration213 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 94%
Watch Gameplay How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (31st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-9600K-$137
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.55 GHz (avg)
Relative performance (0th percentile)
46% Average
Memory 26.9
1-Core 124
2-Core 189
58% 113 Pts
4-Core 358
8-Core 454
52% 406 Pts
64-Core 655
40% 655 Pts
Poor: 82%
This bench: 46%
Great: 103%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650-$155
Nvidia(10DE 2188) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 528.24
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
43.8% Average
Lighting 57.2
Reflection 56.6
Parallax 52.3
47% 55.4 fps
MRender 56.3
Gravity 41.8
Splatting 44
38% 47.4 fps
Poor: 39%
This bench: 43.8%
Great: 46%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
71GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 359 321 227 130 121 121 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
84.7% Excellent
Read 455
Write 408
Mixed 342
SusWrite 213
79% 355 MB/s
4K Read 30.9
4K Write 58
4K Mixed 39
128% 42.6 MB/s
DQ Read 351
DQ Write 265
DQ Mixed 320
236% 312 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 84.7%
Great: 134%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$37
1TB free
Firmware: CC25
SusWrite @10s intervals: 192 185 184 193 181 126 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Read 182
Write 161
Mixed 35
SusWrite 177
100% 139 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.4
85% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 103%
Great: 114%
WD Green 2TB (2012)-$50
104GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 76 77 76 75 76 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
47.1% Average
Read 87.9
Write 72.1
Mixed 53.5
SusWrite 75.8
53% 72.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.8
155% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 47.1%
Great: 84%
WD Green 2TB (2012)-$50
987GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 103 105 104 102 103 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
60.6% Good
Read 108
Write 100
Mixed 69.4
SusWrite 103
70% 95.1 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1
199% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 60.6%
Great: 84%
TOSHIBA DT01ACA200 2TB
56GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.7 6.4 4.9 5.5 6.8 6.4 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
15% Very poor
Read 56.3
Write 25.8
Mixed 35.1
SusWrite 5.9
36% 30.8 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
86% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 15%
Great: 74%
SAMSUNG HD204UI 2TB
30GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 35 34 33 36 33 34 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
19.3% Very poor
Read 33.7
Write 37.7
Mixed 31
SusWrite 34.1
47% 34.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 1
112% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 19.3%
Great: 54%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CM4X16GC3000C15K4 1x16GB
1 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2747 MHz
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
33.4% Below average
MC Read 8.9
MC Write 15.2
MC Mixed 14.5
37% 12.9 GB/s
SC Read 6.5
SC Write 9.2
SC Mixed 5.2
20% 6.97 GB/s
Latency 273
15% 273 ns
Poor: 38%
This bench: 33.4%
Great: 55%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIME Z370-P II Builds (Compare 2,973 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 100%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 98%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 84%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus PRIME Z370-P II

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 115% - Outstanding Total price: $454
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback