Gigabyte GA-B760M GAMING X AX DDR4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 356%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 122%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 428%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (82nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 18 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 125%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics299% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive612% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-B760M GAMING X AX DDR4  (all builds)
Memory25.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.5 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20221012
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateFeb 10 '23 at 14:57
Run Duration199 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-13700KF-$291
U3E1, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 5.15 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
125% Outstanding
Memory 81.9
1-Core 223
2-Core 445
128% 250 Pts
4-Core 891
8-Core 1,700
154% 1,295 Pts
64-Core 3,097
192% 3,097 Pts
Poor: 121%
This bench: 125%
Great: 131%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4080-$970
CLim: 3105 MHz, MLim: 5600 MHz, Ram: 16GB, Driver: 528.49
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
299% Outstanding
Lighting 451
Reflection 430
Parallax 455
368% 445 fps
MRender 555
Gravity 368
Splatting 264
308% 396 fps
Poor: 263%
This bench: 299%
Great: 305%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Lexar NM710 2TB
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 8212
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3929 3899 3912 3931 3947 3932 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
612% Outstanding
Read 4,109
Write 4223
Mixed 2,848
SusWrite 3,925
850% 3,776 MB/s
4K Read 74.2
4K Write 297
4K Mixed 110
411% 161 MB/s
DQ Read 2,220
DQ Write 1,481
DQ Mixed 1,537
1,232% 1,746 MB/s
Poor: 262%
This bench: 612%
Great: 570%
Seagate Expansion HDD 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 0001
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 101
Write 116
Mixed 80.7
74% 99.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.7
135% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 18% Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata DDR4 3600 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 3467 MHz clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
123% Outstanding
MC Read 46.6
MC Write 45.7
MC Mixed 42.4
128% 44.9 GB/s
SC Read 25.8
SC Write 49.9
SC Mixed 35.3
106% 37 GB/s
Latency 77
52% 77 ns
Poor: 77%
This bench: 123%
Great: 132%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-B760M GAMING X AX DDR4 Builds (Compare 578 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 102%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 96%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-B760M GAMING X AX DDR4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 100% - Outstanding Total price: $386
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback