HP Victus by HP Gaming Laptop 15-fa0xxx

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (15th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 85 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics7.51% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive136% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
16 months ago, 16 months ago.
SystemHP Victus by HP Gaming Laptop 15-fa0xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8A50
Memory3.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20221017
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 10 '23 at 08:05
Run Duration116 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-12450H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 1.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
60.6% Good
Memory 46.3
1-Core 90.2
2-Core 210
60% 115 Pts
4-Core 402
8-Core 573
61% 487 Pts
64-Core 747
46% 747 Pts
Poor: 73%
This bench: 60.6%
Great: 96%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
HP(103C 8A50) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 30.0.101.2079
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
7.51% Terrible
Lighting 6.9
Reflection 13
Parallax 7.4
6% 9.1 fps
MRender 14.4
Gravity 13.8
Splatting 13
11% 13.7 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 7.51%
Great: 15%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MTFDKBA512TFH-1BC1AABHA 512GB
425GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPS0043
SusWrite @10s intervals: 662 818 598 635 1050 1190 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
136% Outstanding
Read 1,232
Write 899
Mixed 751
SusWrite 826
207% 927 MB/s
4K Read 27.2
4K Write 43.9
4K Mixed 14.5
83% 28.5 MB/s
DQ Read 416
DQ Write 148
DQ Mixed 365
248% 310 MB/s
Poor: 135%
This bench: 136%
Great: 403%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMAG68EXNSA051N 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
38.7% Below average
MC Read 12.8
MC Write 16.8
MC Mixed 12.8
40% 14.1 GB/s
SC Read 7.6
SC Write 15.1
SC Mixed 9.8
31% 10.8 GB/s
Latency 175
23% 175 ns
Poor: 34%
This bench: 38.7%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Victus by HP Gaming Laptop 15-fa0xxx Builds (Compare 4,667 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

System: HP Victus by HP Gaming Laptop 15-fa0xxx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback