Sony VPCF13C5E

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics2.57% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive27.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemSony VPCF13C5E  (all builds)
MotherboardSony VAIO
Memory5 GB free of 8 GB
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100903
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateFeb 10 '23 at 07:44
Run Duration117 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7 Q 740-$190
N/A, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 1.75 GHz, turbo 1.8 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
52.2% Above average
Memory 79.5
1-Core 45.6
2-Core 86.1
47% 70.4 Pts
4-Core 140
8-Core 181
20% 161 Pts
64-Core 193
12% 193 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 52.2%
Great: 62%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 425M
Sony(104D 907A) 1GB
CLim: 560 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 382.05
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
2.57% Terrible
Lighting 3
Reflection 4.6
Parallax 1.8
2% 3.13 fps
MRender 4.6
Gravity 3.5
Splatting 2.6
3% 3.57 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.57%
Great: 3%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk PLUS 2000GB
2TB free (System drive)
Firmware: UP4504RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 149 84 57 19 63 93 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
27.4% Poor
Read 231
Write 211
Mixed 95.9
SusWrite 77.4
34% 154 MB/s
4K Read 10.7
4K Write 9.5
4K Mixed 9.6
34% 9.93 MB/s
DQ Read 108
DQ Write 31.1
DQ Mixed 32.1
34% 57.2 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 27.4%
Great: 56%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
36.3% Below average
MC Read 14.5
MC Write 11.2
MC Mixed 12.6
36% 12.8 GB/s
SC Read 7.6
SC Write 7.6
SC Mixed 9
23% 8.07 GB/s
Latency 81.4
49% 81.4 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 36.3%
Great: 65%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical VPCF13C5E Builds (Compare 11 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Sony VPCF13C5E

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Above average Total price: $190
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $64G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback