Asus ROG MAXIMUS XIII EXTREME

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 353%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 110%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 353%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 107%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics344% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive319% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardAsus ROG MAXIMUS XIII EXTREME  (all builds)
Memory21.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display5120 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20221212
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateFeb 10 '23 at 03:47
Run Duration319 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-11900K-$254
LGA1200, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.9 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
107% Outstanding
Memory 94.2
1-Core 168
2-Core 339
108% 200 Pts
4-Core 641
8-Core 1,094
105% 868 Pts
64-Core 1,659
103% 1,659 Pts
Poor: 94%
This bench: 107%
Great: 112%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4090-$1,760
CLim: 3165 MHz, MLim: 5350 MHz, Ram: 24GB, Driver: 528.02
Performing below potential (18th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
344% Outstanding
Lighting 529
Reflection 545
Parallax 720
431% 598 fps
MRender 498
Gravity 557
Splatting 295
353% 450 fps
Poor: 303%
This bench: 344%
Great: 407%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme Samsung SSD 970 2TB
379GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1117 1216 1413 1448 1457 1431 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
319% Outstanding
Read 2426
Write 2,226
Mixed 1,766
SusWrite 1,347
435% 1,941 MB/s
4K Read 60.4
4K Write 167
4K Mixed 85.5
289% 104 MB/s
DQ Read 1,204
DQ Write 1,044
DQ Mixed 1,045
805% 1,098 MB/s
Poor: 221%
This bench: 319%
Great: 431%
Mushkin Striker 480GB-$200
88GB free
Firmware: SAFM01.6
SusWrite @10s intervals: 378 380 314 83 379 264 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
80.3% Excellent
Read 354
Write 367
Mixed 307
SusWrite 300
75% 332 MB/s
4K Read 26.7
4K Write 72.2
4K Mixed 33.5
122% 44.1 MB/s
DQ Read 247
DQ Write 219
DQ Mixed 153
137% 206 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 80.3%
Great: 106%
Nvme Samsung SSD 970 2TB
849GB free
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1189 1185 1189 1201 1194 1197 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
254% Outstanding
Read 1,320
Write 1,125
Mixed 1,105
SusWrite 1,192
267% 1,186 MB/s
4K Read 56
4K Write 134
4K Mixed 75.2
252% 88.3 MB/s
DQ Read 1,217
DQ Write 1,037
DQ Mixed 1,114
838% 1,123 MB/s
Poor: 221%
This bench: 254%
Great: 431%
Nvme Samsung SSD 970 2TB
172GB free
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1708 1233 1178 1298 1334 1320 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
309% Outstanding
Read 2,318
Write 2,154
Mixed 1,729
SusWrite 1,345
423% 1,887 MB/s
4K Read 55.2
4K Write 148
4K Mixed 78.4
262% 93.9 MB/s
DQ Read 1,270
DQ Write 1,109
DQ Mixed 1,144
870% 1,174 MB/s
Poor: 221%
This bench: 309%
Great: 431%
ROG ESD-S1C 1TB
817GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 762 762 766 775 767 770 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 58% Great: 90%
HGST Travelstar 7K1000 2.5" 1TB
498GB free
Firmware: JB0OA3B0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 203 211 225 224 224 227 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
110% Outstanding
Read 166
Write 157
Mixed 36.8
SusWrite 219
104% 145 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1
214% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 110%
Great: 75%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G Skill Intl F4-3200C14-8GTZKW 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 2133 MHz clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
106% Outstanding
MC Read 39
MC Write 39
MC Mixed 37.3
110% 38.4 GB/s
SC Read 25.5
SC Write 35.4
SC Mixed 29.1
86% 30 GB/s
Latency 59.3
68% 59.3 ns
Poor: 73%
This bench: 106%
Great: 126%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ROG MAXIMUS XIII EXTREME Builds (Compare 272 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 213%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 108%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 215%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG MAXIMUS XIII EXTREME

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 65% - Good Total price: $1,622
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a large proportion lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales (4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc.). UserBenchmark's data helps consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. In addition, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback