HP ProDesk 400 G1 SFF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics1.36% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive80.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP ProDesk 400 G1 SFF  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 18E9
Memory5.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190424
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 09 '23 at 16:48
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4570-$99
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
64.2% Good
Memory 79.1
1-Core 96.3
2-Core 190
70% 122 Pts
4-Core 280
8-Core 317
39% 299 Pts
64-Core 314
19% 314 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 64.2%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)-$15
HP(103C 18E9) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.5126
Relative performance (0th percentile)
1.36% Terrible
Lighting 0.3
Reflection 2.3
Parallax 5.7
0% 2.77 fps
MRender 6.4
Gravity 2.1
Splatting 4.5
4% 4.33 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 1.36%
Great: 3%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk SD8TB8U256G1001 256GB
137GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X4120101
SusWrite @10s intervals: 172 156 155 155 158 157 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
80.6% Excellent
Read 459
Write 285
Mixed 225
SusWrite 159
62% 282 MB/s
4K Read 28.6
4K Write 67
4K Mixed 38.4
128% 44.7 MB/s
DQ Read 319
DQ Write 249
DQ Mixed 200
173% 256 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 80.6%
Great: 92%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905584-022.A00LF 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (22nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
46.5% Average
MC Read 16.9
MC Write 16.9
MC Mixed 14.8
46% 16.2 GB/s
SC Read 12.3
SC Write 14.5
SC Mixed 13.5
38% 13.4 GB/s
Latency 82.3
49% 82.3 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 46.5%
Great: 59%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ProDesk 400 G1 SFF Builds (Compare 949 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: HP ProDesk 400 G1 SFF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 67% - Good Total price: $142
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a large proportion lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales (4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc.). UserBenchmark's data helps consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. In addition, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback