Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 32% Sail boat	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (19th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 81 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 31%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	2.27% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	37.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (93%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 Duo P7450-$90 2,755 User benchmarks, average bench 36% U2E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.15 GHz, turbo 1.95 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	31% Below average	Memory 55.1 1-Core 28.1 2-Core 40.8 29% 41.3 Pts	4-Core 42.8 8-Core 43.7 6% 43.2 Pts	64-Core 42.6 3% 42.6 Pts
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 31% Great: 41%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 240M 2,359 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Acer(1025 021E) 1GB Ram: 1GB, Driver: 342.01 Performing as expected (51^st percentile)	2.27% Terrible	Lighting 2.7 Reflection 1.3 Parallax 1.2 2% 1.73 fps	MRender 4.5 Gravity 2.1 Splatting 2.5 2% 3.03 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 2.27% Great: 3%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
BR 512GB 512GB 233 User benchmarks, average bench 116% 421GB free (System drive) Firmware: HPS2227O SusWrite @10s intervals: 41 59 49 86 103 110 MB/s Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	37.3% Below average	Read 506 Write 9 Mixed 39.1 SusWrite 74.8 33% 157 MB/s	4K Read 10 4K Write 13.8 4K Mixed 5.3 29% 9.7 MB/s	DQ Read 100 DQ Write 79 DQ Mixed 12.2 30% 63.8 MB/s
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 37.3% Great: 233%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x4GB 424,126 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 2 of 2 slots used 8GB SODIMM 15h Reserved Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	14.5% Very poor	MC Read 4.8 MC Write 4.7 MC Mixed 4.4 13% 4.63 GB/s	SC Read 4 SC Write 4.1 SC Mixed 4.3 12% 4.13 GB/s	Latency 143 28% 143 ns
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 14.5% Great: 65%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 37%

Jet ski

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

CPU
Core2 Duo T6600IntelBench 35%, 8,673 samples	29x
Core2 Duo P7450Intel $90Bench 36%, 2,755 samples	16x
Core2 Duo P7370IntelBench 36%, 181 samples	6x

GPU
GeForce GT 240MNvidiaBench 2%, 2,359 samples	66x
GeForce GT 130MNvidiaBench 2%, 682 samples	2x
Mobility Radeon HD 4500ATIBench 1%, 9,615 samples	1x

Value: 22% - Poor

Total price: $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16