RM DESKTOP 300

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics3.33% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive29.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory20GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 20GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
16 months ago, 16 months ago.
SystemRM DESKTOP 300  (all builds)
MotherboardIntel DQ57TM
Memory16 GB free of 20 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100615
Uptime10.1 Days
Run DateFeb 09 '23 at 11:19
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7 860-$320
LGA1156, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.85 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
66% Good
Memory 88.7
1-Core 78.4
2-Core 144
64% 104 Pts
4-Core 248
8-Core 279
34% 264 Pts
64-Core 321
20% 321 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 66%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 710
Nvidia(10DE 128B) 2GB
CLim: 954 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
3.33% Terrible
Lighting 4
Reflection 3.9
Parallax 4.3
3% 4.07 fps
MRender 3.6
Gravity 3.9
Splatting 4.9
4% 4.13 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.33%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Gigabyte GP-GSTFS31480GNTD 480GB
274GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFM61.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 175 193 195 138 114 71 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
29.9% Poor
Read 152
Write 100
Mixed 87.3
SusWrite 148
27% 122 MB/s
4K Read 14.3
4K Write 19.5
4K Mixed 11.6
47% 15.1 MB/s
DQ Read 11.3
DQ Write 16.4
DQ Mixed 13.4
10% 13.7 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 29.9%
Great: 98%
WD Re 2TB-$35
1.5TB free
Firmware: 00.0NS03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 132 133 137 139 138 139 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
78.8% Very good
Read 138
Write 128
Mixed 72.7
SusWrite 136
87% 119 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 1
202% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 78.8%
Great: 83%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KVT8FP-HYC KVT8FP-HYC HMT41GU7BFR8A-PB HMT451U6AFR8A-PB 20GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 8192, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
38.6% Below average
MC Read 14.5
MC Write 12.3
MC Mixed 11.7
37% 12.8 GB/s
SC Read 10.1
SC Write 11.6
SC Mixed 11.9
32% 11.2 GB/s
Latency 68.8
58% 68.8 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 38.6%
Great: 40%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical DESKTOP 300 Builds (Compare 27 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: RM DESKTOP 300

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 50% - Above average Total price: $420
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback