Lenovo 90AS0001BR

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics3.26% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive33.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemLenovo 90AS0001BR  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO
Memory9.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140917
Uptime5.2 Days
Run DateFeb 09 '23 at 01:40
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4770S-$112
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
67.8% Good
Memory 79.3
1-Core 101
2-Core 171
69% 117 Pts
4-Core 305
8-Core 479
48% 392 Pts
64-Core 481
30% 481 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 67.8%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)-$15
Legend(17AA 3098) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4963
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
3.26% Terrible
Lighting 3.5
Reflection 2.5
Parallax 6.4
3% 4.13 fps
MRender 8
Gravity 2.3
Splatting 4.8
4% 5.03 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.26%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk PLUS 240GB
93GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UF8704RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 222 68 49 30 42 52 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
33.9% Below average
Read 268
Write 304
Mixed 140
SusWrite 77
44% 197 MB/s
4K Read 13.2
4K Write 29.1
4K Mixed 12.7
52% 18.3 MB/s
DQ Read 64.9
DQ Write 60.1
DQ Mixed 24.4
29% 49.8 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 33.9%
Great: 56%
WD Blue 250GB (2007)-$25
233GB free
Firmware: 02.03E02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 87 84 87 88 88 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
47.8% Average
Read 79.9
Write 85
Mixed 57
SusWrite 86.4
57% 77.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.9
164% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 47.8%
Great: 55%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown SH5641G8FH8N6TNSQG 1418 RZX-D3D10M1600B-8G 16GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
44.4% Average
MC Read 14.6
MC Write 17.2
MC Mixed 12.5
42% 14.8 GB/s
SC Read 12.6
SC Write 18
SC Mixed 16.6
45% 15.7 GB/s
Latency 81.9
49% 81.9 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 90AS0001BR Builds (Compare 6 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

System: Lenovo 90AS0001BR

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 89% - Excellent Total price: $199
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback