Asus P8P67 PRO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics27.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive85.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (87%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
16 months ago, 15 months ago.
MotherboardAsus P8P67 PRO  (all builds)
Memory8.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20110302
Uptime3.5 Days
Run DateFeb 08 '23 at 22:43
Run Duration164 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 87%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2500K-$246
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
69.9% Good
Memory 93.2
1-Core 83.5
2-Core 187
71% 121 Pts
4-Core 270
8-Core 280
37% 275 Pts
64-Core 328
20% 328 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 69.9%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 528.24
Performing below potential (35th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
27.9% Poor
Lighting 35.2
Reflection 38.3
Parallax 36.4
29% 36.6 fps
MRender 34.9
Gravity 38
Splatting 26.6
26% 33.2 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 27.9%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 870 Evo 250GB-$48
87GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 310 344 355 305 295 304 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
85.9% Excellent
Read 349
Write 335
Mixed 261
SusWrite 319
71% 316 MB/s
4K Read 26.2
4K Write 71.9
4K Mixed 32.9
120% 43.7 MB/s
DQ Read 388
DQ Write 312
DQ Mixed 264
221% 322 MB/s
Poor: 67%
This bench: 85.9%
Great: 128%
Crucial P2 3D NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$55
440GB free
Firmware: P2CR033 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 760 885 916 749 715 769 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
143% Outstanding
Read 758
Write 911
Mixed 800
SusWrite 799
185% 817 MB/s
4K Read 37.6
4K Write 81.7
4K Mixed 39.7
151% 53 MB/s
DQ Read 378
DQ Write 428
DQ Mixed 485
342% 430 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 143%
Great: 253%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$37
738GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 172 184 182 141 124 96 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
95.4% Outstanding
Read 183
Write 174
Mixed 76.3
SusWrite 150
106% 146 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.8
150% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 95.4%
Great: 113%
Toshiba MQ01ABD025VS 250GB
231GB free
Firmware: AZ0U1Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 94 93 91 91 92 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
50.8% Above average
Read 84.5
Write 90.8
Mixed 37.1
SusWrite 92.3
56% 76.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.5
106% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 50.8%
Great: 54%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX1600C9D3/4GX Corsair CMZ16GX3M4A1600C9 KHX1600C9D3/4GX Corsair CMZ16GX3M4A1600C9 16GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
47.4% Average
MC Read 17.2
MC Write 15.8
MC Mixed 14
45% 15.7 GB/s
SC Read 13.7
SC Write 16.8
SC Mixed 15.3
44% 15.3 GB/s
Latency 61.6
65% 61.6 ns
Poor: 41%
This bench: 47.4%
Great: 62%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8P67 PRO Builds (Compare 1,049 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus P8P67 PRO - $230

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 56% - Above average Total price: $849
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback