Positivo POS-AG31AP

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 31%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (22nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 78 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 30%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics0.98% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive28.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (39%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemPositivo POS-AG31AP  (all builds)
MotherboardPositivo POS-AG31AP
Memory1.3 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20090622
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateFeb 08 '23 at 20:30
Run Duration176 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU 39%

 PC Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium E5200-$47
Socket 775, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
30% Poor
Memory 50.9
1-Core 33.8
2-Core 46.1
30% 43.6 Pts
4-Core 55.1
8-Core 54.5
7% 54.8 Pts
64-Core 55
3% 55 Pts
Poor: 22%
This bench: 30%
Great: 43%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 5450
PwrHis(1787 2291) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1062.1004
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
0.98% Terrible
Lighting 1.1
Reflection 1.5
Parallax 1.6
1% 1.4 fps
MRender 1.4
Gravity 0.5
Splatting 2
1% 1.3 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 0.98%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
133GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S3Z40107
SusWrite @10s intervals: 185 195 98 127 45 87 MB/s
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
28.4% Poor
Read 177
Write 163
Mixed 158
SusWrite 123
35% 155 MB/s
4K Read 11.9
4K Write 18.4
4K Mixed 8.7
39% 13 MB/s
DQ Read 24.4
DQ Write 73.2
DQ Mixed 23.8
25% 40.5 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 28.4%
Great: 100%
Samsung HM160HI 160GB-$50
139GB free
Firmware: HH100-08
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.6 1.4 1 2 1.6 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Write 4.5
Mixed 3
SusWrite 1.5
2% 3 MB/s
4K Read 2.9
4K Mixed 0
181% 1.45 MB/s
Poor: 11% Great: 36%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR2
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
11.6% Very poor
MC Read 4.1
MC Write 3.2
MC Mixed 3.3
10% 3.53 GB/s
SC Read 3.6
SC Write 3.5
SC Mixed 4.1
11% 3.73 GB/s
Latency 157
25% 157 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 11.6%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical POS-AG31AP Builds (Compare 26 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 40%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Positivo POS-AG31AP

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 43% - Average Total price: $135
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback