MSI X470 GAMING PRO (MS-7B79)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics193% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
High background CPU (25%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star MS-7B79
MotherboardMSI X470 GAMING PRO (MS-7B79)  (all builds)
Memory18.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20200611
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 08 '23 at 19:26
Run Duration155 Seconds
Run User CHE-User
Background CPU 25%

 PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 2700-$185
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
75.2% Very good
Memory 82.4
1-Core 104
2-Core 203
74% 130 Pts
4-Core 366
8-Core 595
59% 480 Pts
64-Core 894
55% 894 Pts
Poor: 64%
This bench: 75.2%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4070-Ti-$765
CLim: 3105 MHz, MLim: 5250 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 528.49
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
193% Outstanding
Lighting 242
Reflection 315
Parallax 365
197% 307 fps
MRender 478
Gravity 292
Splatting 210
253% 326 fps
Poor: 208%
This bench: 193%
Great: 256%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SNV2S1000G 1TB
716GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBM02103
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,940
Write 1,676
Mixed 1,346
368% 1,654 MB/s
4K Read 38.6
4K Write 85.5
4K Mixed 34.6
148% 52.9 MB/s
DQ Read 782
DQ Write 546
DQ Mixed 575
453% 634 MB/s
Poor: 150% Great: 352%
WD Blue 250GB-$81
232GB free
Firmware: X41100WD
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 454
Write 448
Mixed 330
92% 411 MB/s
4K Read 29.7
4K Write 60.3
4K Mixed 36.8
124% 42.3 MB/s
DQ Read 321
DQ Write 306
DQ Mixed 250
205% 293 MB/s
Poor: 59% Great: 100%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3600 C18 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2933 MHz
Performing below potential (29th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
89.3% Excellent
MC Read 35.8
MC Write 32.1
MC Mixed 30.4
94% 32.8 GB/s
SC Read 20.7
SC Write 27.7
SC Mixed 24.4
69% 24.3 GB/s
Latency 76.2
52% 76.2 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 89.3%
Great: 126%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X470 GAMING PRO (MS-7B79) Builds (Compare 1,490 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 83%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 81%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: MSI X470 GAMING PRO (MS-7B79) - $112

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 101% - Outstanding Total price: $634
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback