Asus P8Z68-V LE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 50%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 41%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics72.1% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive81.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus P8Z68-V LE  (all builds)
Memory28.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130909
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 08 '23 at 17:53
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 1660 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E3-1230 V2-$266
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
65.4% Good
Memory 80.3
1-Core 92.6
2-Core 172
67% 115 Pts
4-Core 274
8-Core 417
43% 346 Pts
64-Core 443
27% 443 Pts
Poor: 62%
This bench: 65.4%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-$200
CLim: 2175 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 528.02
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
72.1% Very good
Lighting 96.1
Reflection 90.7
Parallax 78.6
78% 88.5 fps
MRender 65.1
Gravity 81
Splatting 73.4
60% 73.2 fps
Poor: 62%
This bench: 72.1%
Great: 73%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
V Series SATA SSD 240GB
76GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V4.18.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 340 390 389 421 412 346 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
81.6% Excellent
Read 447
Write 408
Mixed 346
SusWrite 383
89% 396 MB/s
4K Read 28.8
4K Write 60.8
4K Mixed 22.8
105% 37.5 MB/s
DQ Read 176
DQ Write 224
DQ Mixed 31
71% 144 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 81.6%
Great: 91%
WD Green 2TB (2012)-$50
1.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 60 61 62 62 61 65 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
58.8% Above average
Read 143
Write 65
Mixed 69.1
SusWrite 61.7
63% 84.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.6
104% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 58.8%
Great: 84%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9965525-116.A00LF 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
54.2% Above average
MC Read 20.2
MC Write 19.8
MC Mixed 16.9
54% 19 GB/s
SC Read 15.3
SC Write 16.6
SC Mixed 16.6
46% 16.2 GB/s
Latency 80
50% 80 ns
Poor: 48%
This bench: 54.2%
Great: 90%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8Z68-V LE Builds (Compare 602 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 40%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus P8Z68-V LE

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 68% - Good Total price: $463
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback