Asus PRIME B250M-J

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (15th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 85 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics72.8% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive18% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus PRIME B250M-J  (all builds)
Memory5.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170707
Uptime1.9 Days
Run DateFeb 08 '23 at 17:18
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User PHL-User
Background CPU10%
Watch Gameplay: 1660-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7500-$89
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
56.4% Above average
Memory 62.2
1-Core 84.9
2-Core 208
64% 118 Pts
4-Core 316
8-Core 170
36% 243 Pts
64-Core 368
23% 368 Pts
Poor: 45%
This bench: 56.4%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti-$143
Nvidia(10DE 2182) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 516.94
Performing below potential (24th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
72.8% Very good
Lighting 95.4
Reflection 92.8
Parallax 85.9
78% 91.4 fps
MRender 95.7
Gravity 90.1
Splatting 55.3
63% 80.4 fps
Poor: 70%
This bench: 72.8%
Great: 81%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSD 128GB 128GB
44GB free (System drive)
Firmware: FW200807
SusWrite @10s intervals: 52 56 62 67 68 67 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
18% Very poor
Read 81.2
Write 54.1
Mixed 68.2
SusWrite 61.7
15% 66.3 MB/s
4K Read 10.4
4K Write 10.5
4K Mixed 7.1
30% 9.33 MB/s
DQ Read 48.4
DQ Write 33.7
DQ Mixed 15.7
19% 32.6 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 18%
Great: 93%
Seagate ST1000LM035-1RK172 1TB
248GB free
Firmware: SDM3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 55 59 63 71 70 69 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
36.3% Below average
Read 61
Write 47.5
Mixed 39.7
SusWrite 64.4
39% 53.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 3.6
4K Mixed 0.4
140% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 36.3%
Great: 71%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5702-085.A00G 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
34.3% Below average
MC Read 13.4
MC Write 13.7
MC Mixed 10.4
36% 12.5 GB/s
SC Read 6.5
SC Write 8.7
SC Mixed 7.8
22% 7.67 GB/s
Latency 121
33% 121 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 34.3%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIME B250M-J Builds (Compare 36 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus PRIME B250M-J

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 73% - Very good Total price: $121
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $50
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback