Performance Results


Gaming 3% Tree trunk	Desktop 20% Surfboard	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (19th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 81 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 18.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics	0.74% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	34.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron N3450 6,637 User benchmarks, average bench 27% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.1 GHz, turbo 1.2 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	18.9% Very poor	Memory 26.6 1-Core 20.1 2-Core 42.1 18% 29.6 Pts	4-Core 64.2 8-Core 71.2 9% 67.7 Pts	64-Core 67.3 4% 67.3 Pts
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 18.9% Great: 36%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 500 7,914 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Intel(8086 2212) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8681 Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	0.74% Terrible	Lighting 0.5 Reflection 0.6 Parallax 1.2 0% 0.77 fps	MRender 1.8 Gravity 1.4 Splatting 1.8 1% 1.67 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 0.74% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Wdxsky W31-256G 256GB 6 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 165GB free (System drive) Firmware: T0910A0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 155 167 140 191 173 192 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	34.9% Below average	Read 170 Write 168 Mixed 154 SusWrite 170 37% 166 MB/s	4K Read 11 4K Write 21.1 4K Mixed 11.1 42% 14.4 MB/s	DQ Read 123 DQ Write 95.4 DQ Mixed 41.4 49% 86.6 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 34.9% Great: 79%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
ABCD 123456789012345678 4x2GB 5,869 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 4 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM LPDDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	19.2% Very poor	MC Read 5.7 MC Write 9.3 MC Mixed 7.3 21% 7.43 GB/s	SC Read 2.3 SC Write 3.5 SC Mixed 2.6 8% 2.8 GB/s	Latency 275 14% 275 ns
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 19.2% Great: 29%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 4%

Tree trunk

Desktop 27%

Raft

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

CPU
Celeron N3450IntelBench 27%, 6,637 samples	13x

GPU
HD Graphics 500IntelBench 1%, 7,914 samples	8x
HD GraphicsIntelBench 1%, 15,538 samples	5x

RAM
123456789012345678 4x2GBABCDBench 24%, 5,869 samples	13x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16