Aftershock P95_96_97Ex,Rx

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 58%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 48%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics84.1% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemAftershock P95_96_97Ex,Rx  (all builds)
MotherboardAftershock P95_96_97Ex,Rx
Memory3.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20190218
Uptime1.4 Days
Run DateFeb 08 '23 at 08:43
Run Duration131 Seconds
Run User MYS-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
67.5% Good
Memory 76.2
1-Core 122
2-Core 200
76% 132 Pts
4-Core 317
8-Core 469
49% 393 Pts
64-Core 520
32% 520 Pts
Poor: 49%
This bench: 67.5%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070 (Mobile Max-Q)
Clevo(1558 95E1) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 31.0.15.2824
Performing below potential (72nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
84.1% Excellent
Lighting 101
Reflection 151
Parallax 105
82% 119 fps
MRender 144
Gravity 96.9
Splatting 89.8
88% 110 fps
Poor: 52%
This bench: 84.1%
Great: 94%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$54
45GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B4QFXO7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,251
Write 1,090
Mixed 1,107
256% 1,149 MB/s
4K Read 41.9
4K Write 77
4K Mixed 55.6
176% 58.2 MB/s
DQ Read 629
DQ Write 401
DQ Mixed 534
393% 522 MB/s
Poor: 122% Great: 239%
ASE12NVME512 512GB
103GB free
Firmware: ECFM12.3 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 250 501 482 450 439 422 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
116% Outstanding
Read 616
Write 1,018
Mixed 316
SusWrite 424
134% 593 MB/s
4K Read 26.5
4K Write 66.6
4K Mixed 40.3
127% 44.5 MB/s
DQ Read 708
DQ Write 463
DQ Mixed 584
436% 585 MB/s
Poor: 106%
This bench: 116%
Great: 222%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown IM48GS88N26-JJJHA0 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Relative performance (0th percentile)
42.4% Average
MC Read 15.3
MC Write 17.2
MC Mixed 11.6
42% 14.7 GB/s
SC Read 10.2
SC Write 14.8
SC Mixed 12
35% 12.3 GB/s
Latency 87.9
46% 87.9 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 42.4%
Great: 83%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P95_96_97Ex,Rx Builds (Compare 22 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

System: Aftershock P95_96_97Ex,Rx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback