Asrock B450M-HDV R4.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics16.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive77.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (31%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock B450M-HDV R4.0  (all builds)
Memory12.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191114
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 08 '23 at 05:46
Run Duration173 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 31%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3600-$86
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
87.6% Excellent
Memory 80
1-Core 141
2-Core 278
90% 167 Pts
4-Core 512
8-Core 842
83% 677 Pts
64-Core 1,040
64% 1,040 Pts
Poor: 73%
This bench: 87.6%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130
CLim: 1500 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 22.11.2
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
16.8% Very poor
Lighting 0.2
Reflection 63.4
Parallax 96.8
0% 53.5 fps
MRender 64.5
Gravity 73.1
Splatting 47.7
49% 61.8 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 16.8%
Great: 56%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata SU630 240GB
40GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S211028
SusWrite @10s intervals: 427 438 431 338 66 60 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
77.7% Very good
Read 480
Write 450
Mixed 437
SusWrite 293
93% 415 MB/s
4K Read 32.3
4K Write 41.8
4K Mixed 21.9
99% 32 MB/s
DQ Read 193
DQ Write 300
DQ Mixed 225
176% 239 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 77.7%
Great: 101%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown GD2.1527WC.001 GD2.1527WT.001 16GB
3000, 3000 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
83.8% Excellent
MC Read 34.5
MC Write 22.4
MC Mixed 32.8
85% 29.9 GB/s
SC Read 24.9
SC Write 22
SC Mixed 33
76% 26.6 GB/s
Latency 80.6
50% 80.6 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 83.8%
Great: 100%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical B450M-HDV R4.0 Builds (Compare 4,664 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 44%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 41%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Asrock B450M-HDV R4.0 - $70

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 94% - Outstanding Total price: $418
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback