Asus ROG ZENITH EXTREME

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 103%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 133%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics122% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive223% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago.
MotherboardAsus ROG ZENITH EXTREME  (all builds)
Memory28.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.3 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170928
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 21 '17 at 01:56
Run Duration236 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen TR 1950X-$225
SP3r2, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.7 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
81% Excellent
Memory 70.6
1-Core 122
2-Core 244
79% 145 Pts
4-Core 488
8-Core 977
86% 733 Pts
64-Core 2,696
167% 2,696 Pts
Poor: 68%
This bench: 81%
Great: 85%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485
EVGA(3842 6797) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 3002 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 388.16
Performing below potential (43rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
122% Outstanding
Lighting 165
Reflection 208
Parallax 202
134% 192 fps
MRender 133
Gravity 166
Splatting 126
115% 142 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 122%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Amd-raid Array 3 511GB
472GB free
Firmware: 8.2
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
133% Outstanding
Read 1,016
Write 775
Mixed 832
194% 874 MB/s
4K Read 30
4K Write 76.7
4K Mixed 23.4
116% 43.3 MB/s
DQ Read 273
DQ Write 228
DQ Mixed 112
122% 204 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 133%
Great: 240%
Amd-raid Samsung SSD 840 256GB
165GB free
Firmware: DXM0
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
85.4% Excellent
Read 501
Write 488
Mixed 491
110% 493 MB/s
4K Read 27.7
4K Write 56.5
4K Mixed 21.7
100% 35.3 MB/s
DQ Read 25.2
DQ Write 232
DQ Mixed 63.4
68% 107 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 85.4%
Great: 90%
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45
162GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B7Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
223% Outstanding
Read 2,421
Write 1,126
Mixed 1,284
353% 1,610 MB/s
4K Read 53.4
4K Write 99.6
4K Mixed 27
168% 60 MB/s
DQ Read 236
DQ Write 153
DQ Mixed 109
104% 166 MB/s
Poor: 142%
This bench: 223%
Great: 236%
Amd-raid WDC WD8002FRYZ-0 8TB
3TB free
Firmware: 01.0
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
57.2% Above average
Read 101
Write 97.5
Mixed 68.8
66% 89 MB/s
4K Read 0.87
4K Write 3.96
4K Mixed 0.81
199% 1.88 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 57.2%
Great: 63%
Amd-raid Array 4 8TB
2TB free
Firmware: 8.2
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
136% Outstanding
Read 278
Write 194
Mixed 228
176% 234 MB/s
4K Read 2.27
4K Write 5.29
4K Mixed 0.47
245% 2.68 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 136%
Great: 254%
Amd-raid WDC WD4000F9YZ-0 4TB
2TB free
Firmware: 01.0
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
76.1% Very good
Read 139
Write 126
Mixed 114
95% 126 MB/s
4K Read 0.88
4K Write 2.76
4K Mixed 0.26
117% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 77%
This bench: 76.1%
Great: 99%
Amd-raid WDC WD40EFRX-68W 4TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 80.0
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
59.2% Above average
Read 96.5
Write 110
Mixed 93.1
75% 99.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.55
4K Write 2.05
4K Mixed 0.21
84% 0.94 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 59.2%
Great: 86%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3600 C17 4x8GB
4 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 3334 MHz clocked @ 1667 MHz
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
176% Outstanding
MC Read 70.4
MC Write 76.5
MC Mixed 64.6
201% 70.5 GB/s
SC Read 17.4
SC Write 45.6
SC Mixed 26.7
85% 29.9 GB/s
Latency 99.9
40% 99.9 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 176%
Great: 136%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ROG ZENITH EXTREME Builds (Compare 431 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 100%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 121%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG ZENITH EXTREME - $29

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $806
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback