Gateway SX2110G

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 17%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 14.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics0.86% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive29.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (81%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemGateway SX2110G  (all builds)
MotherboardGateway SX2110G
Memory3.1 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130314
Uptime1.8 Days
Run DateFeb 07 '23 at 19:03
Run Duration199 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 81%

 PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD E1-1500 APU (2012 M.Za)
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.5 GHz, turbo 1.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
14.7% Very poor
Memory 25.6
1-Core 11.6
2-Core 20.5
14% 19.2 Pts
4-Core 24.4
8-Core 18.3
3% 21.3 Pts
64-Core 18.3
1% 18.3 Pts
Poor: 12%
This bench: 14.7%
Great: 35%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 7310
Acer(1025 0592) 256MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.0
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
0.86% Terrible
Lighting 1
Reflection 1.5
Parallax 1.4
1% 1.3 fps
MRender 1.6
Gravity 0.4
Splatting 1.4
1% 1.13 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.86%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata Ultimate SU800 512GB-$66
346GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R0427ANR
SusWrite @10s intervals: 150 106 74 99 138 89 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
29.7% Poor
Read 128
Write 138
Mixed 158
SusWrite 109
30% 133 MB/s
4K Read 12.6
4K Write 17.7
4K Mixed 15.5
48% 15.3 MB/s
DQ Read 69.8
DQ Write 52.2
DQ Mixed 57.3
44% 59.8 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 29.7%
Great: 127%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston ACR16D3LU1KDG/2G ACR16D3LU1NGG/4G 6GB
1066, 1066 MHz
2048, 4096 MB
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
7.81% Terrible
MC Read 2.9
MC Write 2.2
MC Mixed 2.7
7% 2.6 GB/s
SC Read 1.7
SC Write 1.6
SC Mixed 2.3
5% 1.87 GB/s
Latency 282
14% 282 ns
Poor: 6%
This bench: 7.81%
Great: 56%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical SX2110G Builds (Compare 16 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete

System: Gateway SX2110G

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback