Red KVM

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 51.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Boot Drive19.9% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory100GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 100GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemRed KVM  (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory96.1 GB free of 100 GB @ 0 GHz
Display800 x 600 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150206
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 07 '23 at 18:28
Run Duration110 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing above expectations (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core (Broadwell, IBRS)
CPU 0, 1 CPU, 32 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 2.1 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
51.1% Above average
Memory 53.4
1-Core 67.3
2-Core 136
48% 85.6 Pts
4-Core 262
8-Core 492
45% 377 Pts
64-Core 1304
81% 1304 Pts
Poor: 11%
This bench: 51.1%
Great: 69%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Red Hat VirtIO 100GB
59GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 86 83 80 75 81 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
19.9% Very poor
Read 208
Write 136
Mixed 180
SusWrite 83.1
34% 152 MB/s
4K Read 6.9
4K Write 5.9
4K Mixed 5.9
21% 6.23 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 19.9%
Great: 60%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Red Hat Hat Hat Hat Hat Hat Hat 100GB
0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 MHz
16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
119% Outstanding
MC Read 62
MC Write 39
MC Mixed 48.1
142% 49.7 GB/s
SC Read 8
SC Write 12.1
SC Mixed 12.8
31% 11 GB/s
Latency 149
27% 149 ns
Poor: 68%
This bench: 119%
Great: 132%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical KVM Builds (Compare 10 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 83%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 77%
Battleship

System: Red KVM

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 89% - Excellent Total price: $266
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback