Lenovo 20W6001LUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics24.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive115% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 20W6001LUS  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 20W6001LUS
Memory22.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220831
Uptime1 Days
Run DateFeb 07 '23 at 18:04
Run Duration115 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 16%

 PC Performing below expectations (28th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-1165G7
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
63% Good
Memory 72.6
1-Core 154
2-Core 174
79% 133 Pts
4-Core 288
8-Core 501
48% 395 Pts
64-Core 518
32% 518 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 63%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia T500
Legend(17AA 22CB) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 31.0.15.1766
Performing below potential (28th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
24.5% Poor
Lighting 30.5
Reflection 22
Parallax 39.5
25% 30.7 fps
MRender 22.6
Gravity 33.9
Splatting 30
24% 28.8 fps
Poor: 23%
This bench: 24.5%
Great: 33%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLB512HBJQ-000L7 512GB
212GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5M2QEXF7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 290 173 185 270 199 235 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
115% Outstanding
Read 1,131
Write 896
Mixed 793
SusWrite 226
170% 762 MB/s
4K Read 32
4K Write 87.7
4K Mixed 50.4
160% 56.7 MB/s
DQ Read 173
DQ Write 85.6
DQ Mixed 62.8
64% 107 MB/s
Poor: 130%
This bench: 115%
Great: 347%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 4ATS2G64HZ-3G2B1 Hynix HMAA2GS6CJR8N-XN 32GB
3200, 3200 MHz
16384, 16384 MB
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
82.3% Excellent
MC Read 28.8
MC Write 35.3
MC Mixed 27.3
87% 30.5 GB/s
SC Read 15.6
SC Write 33.5
SC Mixed 17.4
63% 22.2 GB/s
Latency 95.5
42% 95.5 ns
Poor: 37%
This bench: 82.3%
Great: 95%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 20W6001LUS Builds (Compare 10 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 20W6001LUS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback