Intel H61

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics30.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive41.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardIntel H61  (all builds)
Memory12.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20201230
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 07 '23 at 15:34
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User DZA-User
Background CPU 13%

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3570
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
72.5% Very good
Memory 84.3
1-Core 93.5
2-Core 184
70% 121 Pts
4-Core 354
8-Core 340
47% 347 Pts
64-Core 356
22% 356 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 72.5%
Great: 75%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-2048SP
AMD(1002 0B31) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1244 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 22.11.2
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
30.1% Below average
Lighting 31.6
Reflection 56.4
Parallax 51.1
26% 46.4 fps
MRender 55.4
Gravity 48
Splatting 41.2
39% 48.2 fps
Poor: 33%
This bench: 30.1%
Great: 47%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Lexar 240GB SSD 240GB
51GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V3.0.8
SusWrite @10s intervals: 23 34 32 28 7.7 24 MB/s
Performing below potential (14th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
41.6% Average
Read 252
Write 225
Mixed 155
SusWrite 24.9
37% 164 MB/s
4K Read 27.7
4K Write 31.3
4K Mixed 22.6
88% 27.2 MB/s
DQ Read 110
DQ Write 37
DQ Mixed 53.8
45% 67 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 41.6%
Great: 96%
Samsung HD322GJ 320GB
28GB free
Firmware: 1AR10001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 87 85 81 84 82 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
43.7% Average
Read 68.5
Write 97.2
Mixed 56.3
SusWrite 83.7
56% 76.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.8
139% 1 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 43.7%
Great: 81%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown-02X.A00LF 16GB
0, 0 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
58.2% Above average
MC Read 21.3
MC Write 22
MC Mixed 17.9
58% 20.4 GB/s
SC Read 16.9
SC Write 17.4
SC Mixed 16.9
49% 17.1 GB/s
Latency 72.9
55% 72.9 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 58.2%
Great: 62%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H61 Builds (Compare 10,320 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Intel H61

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $87
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback