MSI Z270-A PRO (MS-7A71)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 69%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 57%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics78.1% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemMSI MS-7A71
MotherboardMSI Z270-A PRO (MS-7A71)  (all builds)
Memory10.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170628
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateFeb 06 '23 at 21:16
Run Duration144 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700K-$249
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
84.3% Excellent
Memory 90.7
1-Core 127
2-Core 244
87% 154 Pts
4-Core 423
8-Core 590
64% 507 Pts
64-Core 620
38% 620 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 84.3%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3050-$250
PNY(196E 1397) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2250 MHz, MLim: 4000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 528.24
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
78.1% Very good
Lighting 105
Reflection 86.9
Parallax 102
86% 98 fps
MRender 93.6
Gravity 76.1
Splatting 67
63% 78.9 fps
Poor: 69%
This bench: 78.1%
Great: 79%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 600p Series NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB-$49
17GB free (System drive)
Firmware: PSF109C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 799
Write 574
Mixed 537
141% 637 MB/s
4K Read 28.5
4K Write 95.9
4K Mixed 40.7
146% 55 MB/s
DQ Read 277
DQ Write 534
DQ Mixed 316
265% 376 MB/s
Poor: 79% Great: 157%
Adata Ultimate SU800 1TB-$100
446GB free
Firmware: Q0922FS
SusWrite @10s intervals: 64 23 395 446 441 446 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
89.7% Excellent
Read 484
Write 438
Mixed 395
SusWrite 303
91% 405 MB/s
4K Read 26.8
4K Write 84.4
4K Mixed 41.9
139% 51 MB/s
DQ Read 263
DQ Write 113
DQ Mixed 0.6
50% 126 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 89.7%
Great: 126%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$28
125GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 125 123 123 125 124 125 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
71.3% Very good
Read 124
Write 128
Mixed 85.5
SusWrite 124
85% 116 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1
197% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 71.3%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F4-3000C16-8GTZR 04CD F4-3200C16-8GTZR 16GB
2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
69.9% Good
MC Read 26
MC Write 26.7
MC Mixed 20.3
70% 24.3 GB/s
SC Read 17.5
SC Write 26.8
SC Mixed 22
63% 22.1 GB/s
Latency 66.3
60% 66.3 ns
Poor: 37%
This bench: 69.9%
Great: 97%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z270-A PRO (MS-7A71) Builds (Compare 6,631 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 89%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 76%
Battleship

Motherboard: MSI Z270-A PRO (MS-7A71) - $114

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 91% - Outstanding Total price: $706
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback