ADD TO PC
BUILD

Hp-pavilion VG210AA-ABD p6121de

Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 42% Speed boat	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 45.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	1.08% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	42.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	Hp-pavilion VG210AA-ABD p6121de (all builds)
Motherboard	PEGATRON NARRA5
Memory	2 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display	1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20090320
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Feb 06 '23 at 20:07
Run Duration	136 Seconds
Run User	SRB-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Phenom X3 8750 397 User benchmarks, average bench 42% Socket AM2 , 1 CPU, 3 cores, 3 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)	45.5% Average	Memory 75 1-Core 34.8 2-Core 69.7 41% 59.8 Pts	4-Core 99.7 8-Core 76.9 12% 88.3 Pts	64-Core 92 6% 92 Pts
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 45.5% Great: 48%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce G210 3,988 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Device(1B0A 9045) 512MB Ram: 512MB, Driver: 341.74 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	1.08% Terrible	Lighting 1.4 Reflection 0.4 Parallax 0.3 1% 0.7 fps	MRender 1.9 Gravity 0.5 Splatting 1.2 1% 1.2 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.08% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 EVO 250GB 50 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 198GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 163 174 176 178 149 144 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	42.9% Average	Read 238 Write 193 Mixed 152 SusWrite 164 42% 187 MB/s	4K Read 20.2 4K Write 24.7 4K Mixed 17.6 66% 20.8 MB/s	DQ Read 46.3 DQ Write 90.6 DQ Mixed 53.8 45% 63.6 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 42.9% Great: 89%
WD Green 1TB (2009)-$72 103,919 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 782GB free Firmware: 01.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 84 85 84 85 86 MB/s Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	50.9% Above average	Read 92.5 Write 83 Mixed 55.4 SusWrite 84.7 58% 78.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.9 155% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 50.9% Great: 57%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x2GB 446,702 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 2 of 2 slots used 4GB DIMM DDR2 Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)	20.2% Poor	MC Read 9.1 MC Write 5 MC Mixed 5.6 19% 6.57 GB/s	SC Read 4.3 SC Write 3.9 SC Mixed 4.8 12% 4.33 GB/s	Latency 90.4 44% 90.4 ns
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 20.2% Great: 44%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?

Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.

Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?

Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.

Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?

We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.

Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?

The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.

Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?

Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.

The Best.

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback