Asus TUF Z270 MARK 2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 79%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 67%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics90.8% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive151% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory48GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 48GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus TUF Z270 MARK 2  (all builds)
Memory41.9 GB free of 48 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170322
Uptime4.5 Days
Run DateFeb 06 '23 at 19:54
Run Duration136 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU8%
Watch Gameplay: 2060 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700K-$235
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.6 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
83.4% Excellent
Memory 88.6
1-Core 135
2-Core 255
89% 159 Pts
4-Core 422
8-Core 622
65% 522 Pts
64-Core 693
43% 693 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 83.4%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060-$288
Gigabyte(1458 3FC1) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 528.24
Performing below potential (63rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
90.8% Outstanding
Lighting 114
Reflection 107
Parallax 109
93% 110 fps
MRender 133
Gravity 100
Splatting 92.1
87% 109 fps
Poor: 80%
This bench: 90.8%
Great: 97%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 660p NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$60
232GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 004C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 419 73 57 56 59 57 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
151% Outstanding
Read 1,345
Write 890
Mixed 843
SusWrite 120
177% 800 MB/s
4K Read 48.8
4K Write 106
4K Mixed 61.5
209% 72.2 MB/s
DQ Read 331
DQ Write 767
DQ Mixed 343
320% 480 MB/s
Poor: 94%
This bench: 151%
Great: 209%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 1.5TB
624GB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 109 110 110 105 109 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
56.6% Above average
Read 88.9
Write 89.2
Mixed 76.7
SusWrite 108
67% 90.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.9
172% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 56.6%
Great: 63%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 3TB
989GB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 117 114 116 118 117 114 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
64.3% Good
Read 108
Write 127
Mixed 65.6
SusWrite 116
76% 104 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.7
150% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 64.3%
Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX2400C12D4/8GX KF3200C16D4/16GX KHX2400C12D4/8GX KF3200C16D4/16GX 48GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 16384, 8192, 16384 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
74.7% Very good
MC Read 26
MC Write 28.5
MC Mixed 23.5
74% 26 GB/s
SC Read 19.7
SC Write 30.5
SC Mixed 23.7
70% 24.6 GB/s
Latency 69
58% 69 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF Z270 MARK 2 Builds (Compare 1,921 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 71%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 61%
Destroyer

Motherboard: Asus TUF Z270 MARK 2 - $129

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 96% - Outstanding Total price: $639
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback