Asus TUF GAMING Z690-PLUS WIFI

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 387%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 113%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 435%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 112%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics362% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive364% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING Z690-PLUS WIFI  (all builds)
Memory23.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20221130
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 06 '23 at 09:25
Run Duration276 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-12700K-$213
LGA1700, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.6 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
112% Outstanding
Memory 74.5
1-Core 207
2-Core 402
117% 228 Pts
4-Core 796
8-Core 1,459
135% 1,128 Pts
64-Core 2,313
143% 2,313 Pts
Poor: 102%
This bench: 112%
Great: 123%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4090-$1,756
CLim: 3105 MHz, MLim: 5250 MHz, Ram: 24GB, Driver: 528.02
Performing below potential (28th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
362% Outstanding
Lighting 569
Reflection 731
Parallax 640
464% 647 fps
MRender 507
Gravity 547
Splatting 297
353% 450 fps
Poor: 303%
This bench: 362%
Great: 407%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$150
813GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1426 1179 1152 1163 1177 1152 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
364% Outstanding
Read 2,494
Write 2,403
Mixed 1724
SusWrite 1,208
439% 1,957 MB/s
4K Read 71.2
4K Write 209
4K Mixed 99.3
346% 127 MB/s
DQ Read 2,024
DQ Write 1,728
DQ Mixed 1,849
1,393% 1,867 MB/s
Poor: 214%
This bench: 364%
Great: 372%
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$107
556GB free
Firmware: 2B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3451 3343 3431 2191 1440 1566 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
491% Outstanding
Read 2,863
Write 3,536
Mixed 3,133
SusWrite 2,570
684% 3,026 MB/s
4K Read 91
4K Write 233
4K Mixed 129
427% 151 MB/s
DQ Read 2,110
DQ Write 1,771
DQ Mixed 1,920
1,444% 1,933 MB/s
Poor: 274%
This bench: 491%
Great: 488%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 35TB
10TB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 39 45 22 44 57 14 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
46.7% Average
Read 126
Write 45.5
Mixed 9
SusWrite 37
39% 54.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0.2
39% 0.2 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 46.7%
Great: 87%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 6TB
2TB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 109 106 105 107 104 111 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
60.8% Good
Read 104
Write 109
Mixed 89.7
SusWrite 107
76% 103 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.8
167% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 60.8%
Great: 123%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX 5600 C36 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 4800 MHz
Performing below potential (30th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
151% Outstanding
MC Read 60.4
MC Write 60.1
MC Mixed 56
168% 58.8 GB/s
SC Read 19.7
SC Write 45.2
SC Mixed 28.4
89% 31.1 GB/s
Latency 91.4
44% 91.4 ns
Poor: 127%
This bench: 151%
Great: 187%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING Z690-PLUS WIFI Builds (Compare 3,131 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 209%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 115%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 230%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING Z690-PLUS WIFI

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 71% - Very good Total price: $1,199
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback