Acer Extensa 2510G

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 44.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics4.2% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive61.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (88%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAcer Extensa 2510G  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer BA50_HB
Memory5.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1366 x 768 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140711
Uptime4.5 Days
Run DateFeb 06 '23 at 06:50
Run Duration167 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU 88%

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium 3556U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.7 GHz, turbo 1.7 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
44.5% Average
Memory 77.1
1-Core 20.9
2-Core 55.3
37% 51.1 Pts
4-Core 72.9
8-Core 74.5
10% 73.7 Pts
64-Core 77
5% 77 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 44.5%
Great: 52%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 820M
Acer(1025 0868) 1GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 23.21.13.9135
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
4.2% Terrible
Lighting 5.1
Reflection 5.2
Parallax 1.7
4% 4 fps
MRender 4.6
Gravity 5.8
Splatting 5.2
4% 5.2 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 4.2%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$76
43GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 241 189 155 128 112 104 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
61.6% Good
Read 430
Write 254
Mixed 228
SusWrite 155
59% 267 MB/s
4K Read 21.8
4K Write 48.7
4K Mixed 19.9
84% 30.1 MB/s
DQ Read 230
DQ Write 200
DQ Mixed 189
149% 206 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 61.6%
Great: 129%
Kingston DataTraveler 2.0 1GB
1GB free, PID 1f00
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 13.8
Write 2.7
Mixed 4.5
7% 7 MB/s
4K Read 5.5
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
20% 1.83 MB/s
Poor: 3% Great: 5%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5173DB0-YK0 99P5471-006.A00DT 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
38% Below average
MC Read 12.4
MC Write 14.5
MC Mixed 12.8
38% 13.2 GB/s
SC Read 9.1
SC Write 8.6
SC Mixed 12
28% 9.9 GB/s
Latency 86.2
46% 86.2 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 38%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Extensa 2510G Builds (Compare 31 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 42%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Extensa 2510G

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback