Pcware IPMH310 PRO

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics13.2% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemPcware IPMH310 PRO  (all builds)
MotherboardPCWARE IPMH310 PRO
Memory12.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180712
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 06 '23 at 02:08
Run Duration140 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-9400F-$85
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 2.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
66% Good
Memory 84.2
1-Core 81.4
2-Core 158
64% 108 Pts
4-Core 261
8-Core 366
40% 313 Pts
64-Core 309
19% 309 Pts
Poor: 72%
This bench: 66%
Great: 91%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GT 1030
Gigabyte(1458 375C) 2GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 528.24
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
13.2% Very poor
Lighting 16
Reflection 19.8
Parallax 14.2
13% 16.7 fps
MRender 15.4
Gravity 18.2
Splatting 16
14% 16.5 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 13.2%
Great: 15%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk PLUS 120GB
3GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UE4500RL
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 415
Write 245
Mixed 261
68% 307 MB/s
4K Read 18.8
4K Write 25.3
4K Mixed 12.4
58% 18.8 MB/s
DQ Read 51.8
DQ Write 50.7
DQ Mixed 39.5
33% 47.3 MB/s
Poor: 29% Great: 55%
Samsung HD322HJ 320GB-$44
36GB free
Firmware: 1AC01118
SusWrite @10s intervals: 67 70 70 70 70 67 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
45.4% Average
Read 88.7
Write 99.8
Mixed 63.2
SusWrite 68.9
59% 80.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1
183% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 45.4%
Great: 62%
Seagate Momentus 5400.6 2.5" 500GB-$26
68GB free
Firmware: 0001SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 58 60 61 62 61 60 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
33.3% Below average
Read 55.6
Write 56.4
Mixed 35.7
SusWrite 60.3
38% 52 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.7
121% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 33.3%
Great: 43%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown DDR4 2666 859B BLS8G4D26BFSEK.8FD 16GB
2667, 2667 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
80.4% Excellent
MC Read 32.1
MC Write 33.6
MC Mixed 24.7
86% 30.1 GB/s
SC Read 13.6
SC Write 28.3
SC Mixed 11.3
51% 17.7 GB/s
Latency 73.1
55% 73.1 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 80.4%
Great: 87%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical IPMH310 PRO Builds (Compare 10 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

System: Pcware IPMH310 PRO

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 117% - Outstanding Total price: $85
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback